On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 08:56:11PM -0600, Ramirez Luna, Omar wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
When that case is applicable, we should first modify the loader code
or prepare the baseimages to be common so we can get rid of specific
2012/2/15 Víctor M. Jáquez L. vjaq...@igalia.com:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 08:56:11PM -0600, Ramirez Luna, Omar wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
When that case is applicable, we should first modify the loader code
or prepare the
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 01:41:19PM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
2012/2/15 Víctor M. Jáquez L. vjaq...@igalia.com:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 08:56:11PM -0600, Ramirez Luna, Omar wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
When that case is
2012/2/15 Víctor M. Jáquez L. vjaq...@igalia.com:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 08:56:11PM -0600, Ramirez Luna, Omar wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
When that case is applicable, we should first modify the loader code
or prepare the
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 3:06 AM, Ramirez Luna, Omar omar.rami...@ti.com wrote:
On Feb 11, 2012 3:03 PM, Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Ramirez Luna, Omar omar.rami...@ti.com
wrote:
On Feb 10, 2012 12:44 PM, Felipe Contreras
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
When that case is applicable, we should first modify the loader code
or prepare the baseimages to be common so we can get rid of specific
loaders and just dump them into memory.
I'd say the less workarounds,
On Feb 11, 2012 3:03 PM, Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Ramirez Luna, Omar omar.rami...@ti.com
wrote:
On Feb 10, 2012 12:44 PM, Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Dan Carpenter
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 9:18 PM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 04:45:00PM -0800, Ramirez Luna, Omar wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
Again, I'm totally confused as to _WHY_ this needs to be y.
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Ramirez Luna, Omar omar.rami...@ti.com wrote:
On Feb 10, 2012 12:44 PM, Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Dan Carpenter
dan.carpen...@oracle.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 09:42:32PM +0200, Felipe
On Thu, 9 Feb 2012 21:18:49 -0800
Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 04:45:00PM -0800, Ramirez Luna, Omar wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
Again, I'm totally confused as to _WHY_ this needs to
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Justin P. Mattock
justinmatt...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 9 Feb 2012 21:18:49 -0800
Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 04:45:00PM -0800, Ramirez Luna, Omar wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Felipe Contreras
On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:05:59 +0200
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Justin P. Mattock
justinmatt...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 9 Feb 2012 21:18:49 -0800
Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 04:45:00PM -0800,
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 7:18 AM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 04:45:00PM -0800, Ramirez Luna, Omar wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
Again, I'm totally confused as to _WHY_ this needs to be y.
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 06:05:59PM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
From 5c7ad6c00d051d574007cdbecdf14bf3d0cb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Justin P. Mattock justinmatt...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:19:45 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Add dependency TIDSBRIDGE_WDT3 to TIDSBRIDGE.
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 06:05:59PM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
From 5c7ad6c00d051d574007cdbecdf14bf3d0cb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Justin P. Mattock justinmatt...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:19:45
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 06:16:19PM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 7:18 AM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 04:45:00PM -0800, Ramirez Luna, Omar wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Felipe Contreras
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 01:30:48AM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
It's not an oops, it's a warning, and again, it depends on the
firmware being used. We don't have control over that, and we have no
way to detect if this feature is there. It's up to the user.
Perhaps just remove the warning
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Dan Carpenter dan.carpen...@oracle.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 01:30:48AM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
It's not an oops, it's a warning, and again, it depends on the
firmware being used. We don't have control over that, and we have no
way to detect if
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 09:42:32PM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Dan Carpenter dan.carpen...@oracle.com
wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 01:30:48AM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
It's not an oops, it's a warning, and again, it depends on the
firmware being
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Dan Carpenter
dan.carpen...@oracle.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 09:42:32PM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Dan Carpenter dan.carpen...@oracle.com
wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 01:30:48AM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 09:26:16AM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 5:44 AM, Greg KH g...@kroah.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 03:37:55AM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 3:12 AM, Greg KH gre...@suse.de wrote:
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 03:01:32AM
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 09:26:16AM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 5:44 AM, Greg KH g...@kroah.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 03:37:55AM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 8:41 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
I already gave you a good reason, and this came from Linus Torvalds.
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/995419
Notice how he agreed that setting defaults was a good idea. I can't
point to the mails of
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 08:41:55PM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 09:26:16AM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 5:44 AM, Greg KH g...@kroah.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 8:59 PM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 08:41:55PM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 09:26:16AM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Wed, Feb
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
Again, I'm totally confused as to _WHY_ this needs to be y. What is
causing this oops without it? If an oops is happening, then shouldn't
this be a strict dependancy? Why allow it to be disabled at all if
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 04:45:00PM -0800, Ramirez Luna, Omar wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
Again, I'm totally confused as to _WHY_ this needs to be y. What is
causing this oops without it? If an oops is happening, then
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 5:22 AM, Justin P. Mattock
justinmatt...@gmail.com wrote:
not sure if I see this warning or not on my machine, but is there a fix for
the warning? I would rather see that, than hide it with setting: default y
(if that's what its doing!)
No, there's no fix. IIRC Omar said
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 2:11 AM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 5:22 AM, Justin P. Mattock
justinmatt...@gmail.com wrote:
not sure if I see this warning or not on my machine, but is there a fix for
the warning? I would rather see that, than hide it
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 03:01:32AM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
From: Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@nokia.com
The public images have it enabled, it's safer, and we get rid of this
warning:
WARNING: at arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_l3_smx.c:162
omap3_l3_app_irq+0x114/0x15c()
In-band
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 3:12 AM, Greg KH gre...@suse.de wrote:
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 03:01:32AM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
From: Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@nokia.com
The public images have it enabled, it's safer, and we get rid of this
warning:
WARNING: at
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 03:37:55AM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 3:12 AM, Greg KH gre...@suse.de wrote:
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 03:01:32AM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
From: Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@nokia.com
The public images have it enabled, it's
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 5:44 AM, Greg KH g...@kroah.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 03:37:55AM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 3:12 AM, Greg KH gre...@suse.de wrote:
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 03:01:32AM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
From: Felipe Contreras
33 matches
Mail list logo
