* DebBarma, Tarun Kanti tarun.ka...@ti.com [120606 04:15]:
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 2:51 AM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote:
Tarun Kanti DebBarma tarun.ka...@ti.com writes:
Timers in PER domain periodically report old time from TCRR in
posted mode if ick 4*fck. Therefore, set timer to
Tony,
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
* DebBarma, Tarun Kanti tarun.ka...@ti.com [120606 04:15]:
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 2:51 AM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote:
Tarun Kanti DebBarma tarun.ka...@ti.com writes:
Timers in PER domain
* Shilimkar, Santosh santosh.shilim...@ti.com [120620 06:21]:
Tony,
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
* DebBarma, Tarun Kanti tarun.ka...@ti.com [120606 04:15]:
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 2:51 AM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote:
Tarun Kanti
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 2:51 AM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote:
Tarun Kanti DebBarma tarun.ka...@ti.com writes:
Timers in PER domain periodically report old time from TCRR in
posted mode if ick 4*fck. Therefore, set timer to non-posted
whenever ick 4*fck for all timers.
Is there an
Tarun Kanti DebBarma tarun.ka...@ti.com writes:
Timers in PER domain periodically report old time from TCRR in
posted mode if ick 4*fck. Therefore, set timer to non-posted
whenever ick 4*fck for all timers.
Is there an erratum assocaited with this?
Does this problem affect every SoC?