http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12291
a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|PCMCIA |Serial ATA
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12291
a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|linux- |jgar...@pobox.com
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7306
a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|CLOSED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7788
a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7706
a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|PCMCIA bridge not working |(2.6.13rc1 breakage): PCMCIA
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7264
len.br...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REJECTED|REOPENED
Resolution|INVALID
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7264
len.br...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|CLOSED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7264
--- Comment #34 from yakui.z...@intel.com 2009-02-01 21:10 ---
*** Bug 10805 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7264
--- Comment #35 from yakui.z...@intel.com 2009-02-01 21:12 ---
Hi, Pavel
Will you please have an opportunity to push the patch in comment #25 into
upstream kernel?
Thanks.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12471
--- Comment #4 from komurojun-...@nifty.com 2009-01-19 03:36 ---
Hi,
Unfortunately, the pcmciautils maintainer Dominik Brodowski
(li...@dominikbrodowski.net) does not respond these days.
and he only can access and change the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12471
--- Comment #5 from birc...@gmail.com 2009-01-19 10:16 ---
Hello,
(In reply to comment #4)
Unfortunately, the pcmciautils maintainer Dominik Brodowski
(li...@dominikbrodowski.net) does not respond these days.
and he only can
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12471
--- Comment #3 from birc...@gmail.com 2009-01-18 07:24 ---
Hello,
(In reply to comment #2)
Hi,
pcmcia-socket-startup is loaded by /etc/udev/rules.d/60-pcmcia.rules.
At your Distribution,
You should fix the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12471
Summary: udev rules for pcmcia-0.15 with nonstatic socket
contains wrong path to the pcmcia-socket-startup binary
Product: Drivers
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion: 2.6.28
Platform: All
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12471
--- Comment #1 from birc...@gmail.com 2009-01-17 13:53 ---
Created an attachment (id=19868)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=19868action=view)
proposed fix
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12291
a...@osdl.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Regression|0 |1
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7264
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11992
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|linux- |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11992
Summary: [drivers/pcmcia/cistpl.c:357]: Unreachable code
Product: Drivers
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion: latest git tree
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Mainline
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7116
--- Comment #42 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 20:11 ---
And still no fix in 2.6.27.4.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7116
--- Comment #43 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 20:41 ---
Finally, some illumination. I have some more of these IBM HA credit cards.
There seems to have been a firmware update (HAWIN95.EXE) available at some
point. This firmware
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7116
--- Comment #44 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 21:49 ---
I did the obvious thing and flashed the w95 card back to the original
firmware.
Now it works.
Apparently, whatever hack is done by IBM to support Win95 renders the card
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7116
--- Comment #45 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 21:51 ---
It seems that the IBM Win95 kludge has to do with how the separate devices on
the multifunction card are enumerated. Perhaps this is why the above patch
worked for the time
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11911
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|linux- |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11911
Summary: new PCMCIA device instance after resume - orinoco can't
download firmware
Product: Drivers
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion: 2.6.28-rc2
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10949
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-26 06:17 ---
Could you try the kernel 2.6.27?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7304
--- Comment #50 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-23 04:23 ---
(In reply to comment #49)
It seems the pcmcia-cs uses special technique for the cardbus-bridge
that can't get the irq.
Certainly. The real question is: which one :)
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8666
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |REJECTED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8485
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5093
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7011
--- Comment #9 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-22 08:05 ---
Its still around - it needs ata pio to be done with specific irq masking which
is very very hard so won't happen for while
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10661
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8788
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |REJECTED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8762
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-22 08:40 ---
Patch done and fired at wireless maintainer.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7011
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|linux- |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7306
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
KernelVersion|2.6.18 |2.6.26
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7304
--- Comment #49 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-22 18:58 ---
It seems the pcmcia-cs uses special technique for the cardbus-bridge
that can't get the irq.
Currently, no one is working at such old PC for kernel 2.6.x.
I recommend you buy
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7304
--- Comment #37 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-22 23:49 ---
I've just made some other tests. I was wrong when I previously said that in
2.2.x it was yenta: it really was i82365. And it worked without PCI IRQs
numbers as shown in the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7304
--- Comment #40 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-23 06:46 ---
Created an attachment (id=17387)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=17387action=view)
PCI listing for 2.4.22
Additionnal information about PCI listing regarding
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7304
--- Comment #45 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-23 08:28 ---
Created an attachment (id=17396)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=17396action=view)
Boot messages of 2.6.26.2 with yenta patch applied
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7304
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #17396|text/x-c++hdr |text/plain
mime type|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7304
--- Comment #44 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-23 08:26 ---
Created an attachment (id=17395)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=17395action=view)
Patch to force CardBus support in yenta socket even when no IRQ is found.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7304
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #16475|text/x-c++hdr |text/plain
mime type|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7304
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #17396|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7304
--- Comment #48 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-23 08:44 ---
Created an attachment (id=17399)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=17399action=view)
Boot messages of 2.6.26.2 with yenta patch applied
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7304
--- Comment #31 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-13 00:59 ---
I have just tested the 2.6.26.2 kernel with, as usual, the same results.
However, there is a bit more information I can give. On the same laptop,
with a bit old distro and a
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7304
--- Comment #32 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-13 01:00 ---
Created an attachment (id=17204)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=17204action=view)
Boot messages of 2.2.27-pre2
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7304
--- Comment #35 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-13 01:03 ---
Created an attachment (id=17207)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=17207action=view)
List of PCI devices for 2.2.27-pre2
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7304
--- Comment #33 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-13 01:01 ---
Created an attachment (id=17205)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=17205action=view)
Modules list for 2.2.27-pre2
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7306
--- Comment #23 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-01 12:03 ---
Ben - Looks good.
dmesg shows Removing ISA hole at 0xfd00 otherwise very much as
previously. BUT - no OOPS on PCMCIA card insertion, WiFi seems to be OK too.
Will
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7306
--- Comment #24 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-01 15:45 ---
Yes, I'll also send it to -stable for .25 and .26 after I've fully convinced
myself that it won't hurt anything.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7306
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |REOPENED
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7306
--- Comment #22 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-30 23:37 ---
OK will try as soon as I can, but the machine is at home and I'm now at work
(for the next 9 hours or so ;=( )
I assume it's good for kernel 2.6.25.9 ? I'm not quite as
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7306
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7306
--- Comment #20 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-30 21:40 ---
I think I see the problem. In your dmesg, one can see:
PCI host bridge /[EMAIL PROTECTED] (primary) ranges:
IO 0xfe00..0xfe7f - 0x
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7306
--- Comment #21 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-30 22:01 ---
Created an attachment (id=17035)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=17035action=view)
Remove the ISA hole from the bridge resources
This patch should fix the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7306
--- Comment #18 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-29 05:49 ---
No response then from the PPC maintainers? Is anyone there following this
thread?
I note this bug is still shown as CLOSED WILL_FIX_LATER too :-(
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7306
--- Comment #12 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-17 00:01 ---
I see what you're suggesting, but there's no relevant line in
/etc/pcmcia/config.opts - file attached.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7306
--- Comment #13 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-17 00:03 ---
Created an attachment (id=16856)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16856action=view)
file /etc/pcmcia/config.opts as discussed
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7306
--- Comment #14 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-17 00:07 ---
And yes, it certainly _is_ a PPC box! More completely, it's an Apple Powerbook
G3 (Lombard) with a PPC 740 running at 333 MHz
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7306
--- Comment #15 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-17 01:09 ---
Strange. Could you post a full dmesg output (without the reserved option),
please?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7306
--- Comment #16 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-17 01:38 ---
Created an attachment (id=16858)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16858action=view)
dmesg straight after booting without reserve= etc.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7306
--- Comment #17 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-17 01:45 ---
Now this contains interesting information:
pcmcia: parent PCI bridge Memory window: 0xfd00 - 0xfdff
means the PCI host bridge is configured to allow downstream
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7306
--- Comment #8 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-16 00:47 ---
Created an attachment (id=16832)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16832action=view)
Results of lspcmcia etc. after booting without reserve=0x...
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7306
--- Comment #10 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-16 00:56 ---
These files don't look very different but were definitely created with /
without the reserve=0xfd00,0xff kernel boot option as hinted by the
file names. Also the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7306
--- Comment #11 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-16 03:25 ---
Oh. ppc doesn't have /proc/iomem output? (this _is_ a PPC box, right?) Also,
this is a strange box as it doesn't define which iomem area to use for PCI
devices. Therefore,
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7306
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7306
--- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-15 08:38 ---
We had a similar problem a year ago with bcm43xx and b43legacy. In that case,
it was attempted reads of memory that was only present for certain versions of
the wireless
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7306
--- Comment #7 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-15 12:11 ---
what's the output of lspcmcia -vvv (without any card inserted), of lspci -v
and of /proc/iomem (without the reserved boot option)?
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7116
--- Comment #40 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-10 11:26 ---
Hm, that's a tough one. Could you try out kernel 2.6.20 and check whether that
works?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7116
--- Comment #32 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-25 00:07 ---
I'm a bit confused about this one... are pcnet_cs and serial_cs built in,
or is just one of those a module which gets loaded afterwards? It shouldn't
matter, but maybe this
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7116
--- Comment #37 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-25 17:06 ---
Created an attachment (id=16628)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16628action=view)
lspcmcia 2.6.25.8
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7116
--- Comment #38 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-25 17:18 ---
Created an attachment (id=16629)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16629action=view)
dmesg with modules pre-inserted
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10975
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-24 06:48 ---
Created an attachment (id=16597)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16597action=view)
pcmcia: allow for longer CIS firmware filenames
Could you try this bugfix,
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7116
--- Comment #28 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-24 22:22 ---
Created an attachment (id=16609)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16609action=view)
dmesg 2.6.19-rc5
Not too useful because of kobject debug spam. Let me
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7116
--- Comment #31 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-24 22:24 ---
Created an attachment (id=16612)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16612action=view)
lspci 2.6.25.8
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10957
Summary: [KERNEL 2.6.26-rc4] bugreport : pata_pcmcia with
Sandisk Extreme III 8GB
Product: Drivers
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion: 2.6.26-rc4
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10957
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7304
--- Comment #29 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-14 08:05 ---
(In reply to comment #28)
Have you tried loading the yenta_socket module with the option
pwr_irqs_off=1?
Yes. This option is of no help unfortunately. I'll add an attachment
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7304
--- Comment #30 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-14 08:06 ---
Created an attachment (id=16475)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16475action=view)
Dmesg of 2.6.25.6 with yenta_socket module insertion.
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|linux- |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10500
--- Comment #8 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-22 15:12 ---
Created an attachment (id=16249)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16249action=view)
config for kernel .2.6.25
here is my kernel config, the patch did not help
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10661
Summary: PCMCIA: CompactFlash card can't be mounted.
Product: Drivers
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion: 2.6.25.3
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Status: NEW
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10661
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED],
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7215
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7215
--- Comment #16 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-06 13:44 ---
I can suggest git bisect since you have good working version. You can try to
identify what breaks it going from 2.6.8 to 2.6.9 say. See
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10500
--- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-24 03:57 ---
On 04/23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10500
--- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-23 11:07 ---
@Oleg: Can I spend
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10500
--- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-24 05:27 ---
sadly today I get the BUG()s again - dunno why I could not trigger them
yesterday?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10500
--- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-23 11:07 ---
@Oleg: Can I spend you a beer or something? No more errors and my keyboard
still works after the eject. The patch works (however I don't know if this is
the right way - Frank
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10500
Summary: nozomi: kernel BUG()s when card is removed
Product: Drivers
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion: 2.6.25
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Status: NEW
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7706
--- Comment #48 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-15 00:53 ---
Has it been any progress with the bug, any updates? - Thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7706
--- Comment #49 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-15 11:18 ---
no further messages since comment #47 2007-08-09 (see below):
thanks for asking
greets
Susanne
_
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10416
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-07 07:26 ---
Created an attachment (id=15657)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15657action=view)
lspci -vv
lspci -vv output
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10416
Summary: No Cardbus cards available
Product: Drivers
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion: 2.6.24-gentoo-r4/
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Status: NEW
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10416
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
KernelVersion|2.6.24-gentoo-r4/ |2.6.24-gentoo-r4/
--- Comment
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10416
--- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-07 07:35 ---
Created an attachment (id=15658)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15658action=view)
cat /proc/iomem
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7582
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |REJECTED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7304
--- Comment #26 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-02 11:57 ---
(In reply to comment #25)
I think you're using the i82365 driver in 2.4.27 but the yenta driver in 2.6.
From what I remember, it was yenta_socket also in 2.4.x (as it
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7215
--- Comment #14 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-30 12:22 ---
Eric, any updates on this? How is it working with recent kernel?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7264
--- Comment #32 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-30 17:28 ---
Can we refresh data on this problem please. Have you tested with recent kernel,
is the problem still there? If so please provide dmesg again.
Thanks.
--
Configure bugmail:
1 - 100 of 200 matches
Mail list logo