[Bug 7706] PCMCIA bridge not working

2008-04-15 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7706 --- Comment #48 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-15 00:53 --- Has it been any progress with the bug, any updates? - Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 7706] PCMCIA bridge not working

2008-04-15 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7706 --- Comment #49 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-15 11:18 --- no further messages since comment #47 2007-08-09 (see below): thanks for asking greets Susanne _

Re: [2.6 patch] PCMCIA mustn't select HAVE_IDE

2008-04-15 Thread Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
On Monday 14 April 2008, Sam Ravnborg wrote: On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 05:16:59PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: It's plain wrong for PCMCIA to select HAVE_IDE that implies e.g. the availability of an asm/ide.h Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---

Re: [2.6 patch] PCMCIA mustn't select HAVE_IDE

2008-04-15 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:15:34PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: On Monday 14 April 2008, Sam Ravnborg wrote: On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 05:16:59PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: It's plain wrong for PCMCIA to select HAVE_IDE that implies e.g. the availability of an asm/ide.h

Re: [2.6 patch] PCMCIA mustn't select HAVE_IDE

2008-04-15 Thread Russell King
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:15:34PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: On Monday 14 April 2008, Sam Ravnborg wrote: On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 05:16:59PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: It's plain wrong for PCMCIA to select HAVE_IDE that implies e.g. the availability of an asm/ide.h

Re: [2.6 patch] PCMCIA mustn't select HAVE_IDE

2008-04-15 Thread Russell King
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 12:23:26AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:15:34PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: On Monday 14 April 2008, Sam Ravnborg wrote: On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 05:16:59PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: It's plain wrong for PCMCIA to select HAVE_IDE

Re: [2.6 patch] PCMCIA mustn't select HAVE_IDE

2008-04-15 Thread Russell King
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:28:22PM +0100, Russell King wrote: On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 12:23:26AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:15:34PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: On Monday 14 April 2008, Sam Ravnborg wrote: On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 05:16:59PM +0300,

Re: [2.6 patch] PCMCIA mustn't select HAVE_IDE

2008-04-15 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:42:03PM +0100, Russell King wrote: On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:28:22PM +0100, Russell King wrote: On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 12:23:26AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:15:34PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: On Monday 14 April 2008, Sam

Re: [2.6 patch] PCMCIA mustn't select HAVE_IDE

2008-04-15 Thread Russell King
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 12:52:23AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:42:03PM +0100, Russell King wrote: On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:28:22PM +0100, Russell King wrote: On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 12:23:26AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:15:34PM +0200,

Re: [2.6 patch] PCMCIA mustn't select HAVE_IDE

2008-04-15 Thread Russell King
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 01:10:02AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 11:03:45PM +0100, Russell King wrote: On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 12:52:23AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: ... So this is a only impacting ARM wrt. PCMCIA, and given that ARM supplies an asm/ide.h, it's _entirely_