Re: [PATCH 0/3] MXC PCMCIA Support

2010-02-21 Thread Dominik Brodowski
Russell, On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 05:41:00PM +0100, Martin Fuzzey wrote: > Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > I do wonder whether, as you have windows, you should be using the soc > > support - the soc support is based interfacing hardware which does not > > have windows into the generic infrastru

Re: [PATCH 0/3] MXC PCMCIA Support

2010-02-20 Thread Martin Fuzzey
Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > I do wonder whether, as you have windows, you should be using the soc > support - the soc support is based interfacing hardware which does not > have windows into the generic infrastructure which assumes the presence > of windows. > Hi Russell, Yes I understand

Re: [PATCH 0/3] MXC PCMCIA Support

2010-02-20 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 04:32:01PM +0100, Martin Fuzzey wrote: > This patch series adds support for the MXC PCMCIA / CF controller. > > It has been tested on MX21 (with CF card + ide-cs as well as a > broadcom based wificard using b43 driver) > > It has been compile only tested for MX27, MX31 as

[PATCH 0/3] MXC PCMCIA Support

2010-02-20 Thread Martin Fuzzey
This patch series adds support for the MXC PCMCIA / CF controller. It has been tested on MX21 (with CF card + ide-cs as well as a broadcom based wificard using b43 driver) It has been compile only tested for MX27, MX31 as I don't have this hardware but the code is based on Freescale's MX31. Chan