Re: [PATCH 0/3] MXC PCMCIA Support
Russell, On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 05:41:00PM +0100, Martin Fuzzey wrote: Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: I do wonder whether, as you have windows, you should be using the soc support - the soc support is based interfacing hardware which does not have windows into the generic infrastructure which assumes the presence of windows. Hi Russell, Yes I understand what you mean. I asked on -pcmcia about the approach back in June 2009: http://marc.info/?l=linux-pcmciam=124805223926065w=2 but didn't get a reply :( OTOH soc_common provides some other useful stuff like polling thread, common interrupt handler core, common debug etc. What's your opinion in light of this? Best, Dominik ___ Linux PCMCIA reimplementation list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pcmcia
Re: [PATCH 0/3] MXC PCMCIA Support
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 04:32:01PM +0100, Martin Fuzzey wrote: This patch series adds support for the MXC PCMCIA / CF controller. It has been tested on MX21 (with CF card + ide-cs as well as a broadcom based wificard using b43 driver) It has been compile only tested for MX27, MX31 as I don't have this hardware but the code is based on Freescale's MX31. Changes since RFC: * Split arch specifc changes from driver * Update to 2.6.33-rc8 [soc-common is now a standalone module] I do wonder whether, as you have windows, you should be using the soc support - the soc support is based interfacing hardware which does not have windows into the generic infrastructure which assumes the presence of windows. ___ Linux PCMCIA reimplementation list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pcmcia
