disk fails in raid5 but not in raid0

2001-03-19 Thread Per Jessen
Hi, I have a RAID setup, 3 Compaq 4Gb drives running of an Adaptec2940UW. Kernel 2.2.18 with RAID-patches etc. I have been trying out various options, doing some stress-testing etc., and I have now arrived at the following situation that I cannot explain: when running the 3 drives in a RAID5

Re: disk fails in raid5 but not in raid0

2001-03-19 Thread Neil Brown
On Monday March 19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have a RAID setup, 3 Compaq 4Gb drives running of an Adaptec2940UW. Kernel 2.2.18 with RAID-patches etc. I have been trying out various options, doing some stress-testing etc., and I have now arrived at the following situation that I

Re: disk fails in raid5 but not in raid0

2001-03-19 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
Per Jessen wrote: I have a RAID setup, 3 Compaq 4Gb drives running of an Adaptec2940UW. Kernel 2.2.18 with RAID-patches etc. I have been trying out various options, doing some stress-testing etc., and I have now arrived at the following situation that I cannot explain: when running the

RAID5 bug report

2001-03-19 Thread Agus Budy Wuysang
Kernel 2.2.18 SMP + 2.2.18-B0-raid patch HW: - Dual Pentium PRO 200MHz - 256Mb RAM - distro - RH 6.2 w/ latest patches applied # dmesg ... raid5: resync finished. raid5: bug: stripe-bh_new[0], sector 1010936 exists raid5: bh c09c1620, bh_new c40e39c0 The machine runs fine though... no

Re: Problem migrating RAID1 from 2.2.x to 2.4.2

2001-03-19 Thread Neil Brown
On Monday March 19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm having trouble running a RAID1 root/boot mirror under 2.4.2. Works fine on 2.2.14 though. I'm running RH 6.2 with stock 2.2.14 kernel. Running RAID1 on a pair of 9.1 UW SCSI Barracudas as root/boot/lilo. md0 is / and md1 is 256M swap,

Re: Problem migrating RAID1 from 2.2.x to 2.4.2

2001-03-19 Thread Chip Paswater
Neil, I'm on crack. I went into my kernel config to verify the setting, and as it turns out, I compiled in RAID0 support instead of RAID1 Thanks for the help. On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 04:08:18PM +1100, Neil Brown wrote: On Monday March 19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm having trouble