RE: Recovery raid5 after sata cable failure.

2005-07-18 Thread Francisco Zafra
I already tried that: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ # cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [linear] [raid5] md0 : active raid5 sdg1[6] sdf1[5] sde1[4] sdd1[3] sdc1[2] sdb1[1] sda1[0] 1367507456 blocks level 5, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 [8/7] [UUU_] unused devices: none [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ #

RE: Recovery raid5 after sata cable failure.

2005-07-18 Thread Neil Brown
On Monday July 18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I already tried that: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ # cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [linear] [raid5] md0 : active raid5 sdg1[6] sdf1[5] sde1[4] sdd1[3] sdc1[2] sdb1[1] sda1[0] 1367507456 blocks level 5, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 [8/7] [UUU_]

RE: Recovery raid5 after sata cable failure.

2005-07-18 Thread Francisco Zafra
Hi Neil, Since some hours I am trying to solved it with the last version: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ # mdadm --version mdadm - v2.0-devel-2 - DEVELOPMENT VERSION NOT FOR REGULAR USE - 7 July 2005 With the same results :( I really don't think it is locked I dd it in act of desperation and I have no

Re: Recovery raid5 after sata cable failure.

2005-07-18 Thread Brad Campbell
Francisco Zafra wrote: Hi Neil, Since some hours I am trying to solved it with the last version: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ # mdadm --version mdadm - v2.0-devel-2 - DEVELOPMENT VERSION NOT FOR REGULAR USE - 7 July 2005 With the same results :( I really don't think it is locked I dd it in act of

Re: Re: Re[2]: Bugreport mdadm-2.0-devel-1

2005-07-18 Thread Maxim Kozover
Thanks much, Neil, will try. Thanks, Maxim. NB On Saturday July 9, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday July 7, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Neil! Thanks much for your help, array creation using devel-2 just works, however, the array can't be assembled again after it's stopped:( Hmm,

Re: md_import_device returned -16 raid1

2005-07-18 Thread Jim Radford
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005, Luca Berra wrote: On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 04:32:05PM -0700, Jim Radford wrote: lvm2 seems to be the cause, I removed all lv/vg/pv's and it started fine. My guess is I need to change something in the mandrake initscripts (order wise) to make sure lvm doesn't kick into gear