It possibly for this to still have flags in it and a previous
instance has been stopped, and that confused the new array using
the same mddev.
Signed-off-by: Neil Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
### Diffstat output
./drivers/md/md.c |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff
seems i need to change the mail thread to
why my RAID0 write speed so slow! :P
i also use a Marvell 8 port PCI-X card. 8 SATA DISK RAID0, each single
disk can give me around 55MB/s, but the RAID0 can only give me 203MB/s.
I tried different io scheduler, all lead to same write speed at my side.
Hello,
Here are the results using 5 disks for RAID 5 – basically the same
results but with lower values.
Again, much slower than it could be.
*** dd TEST ***
time dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/md0 bs=1M
2819620864 bytes transferred in 23,410720 seconds (120441442 bytes/sec)
iostat 5 output:
i think this is out of my mind now. i think 4+1 DISK with 64KB chunk
size is 256KB which fit the 1M size well. So there should not have any
read happen...
ming
On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 17:29 +0200, Mirko Benz wrote:
Hello,
Here are the results using 5 disks for RAID 5 – basically the same
On Friday August 26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been working on a RAID setup with dual RAID controllers and
three expansion boxes - 48 disks in all, including data, parity and
global spares.
If there are 48 drives, why do your drive-numbers go up to 59?
Confusing but not important.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:linux-raid-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Stromberg
Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 3:01 PM
To: Linux RAID
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: number of global spares?
I've been working on a RAID setup with dual RAID
Guy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
I've been working on a RAID setup with dual RAID controllers and
three expansion boxes - 48 disks in all, including data, parity and
global spares.
[...]
They don't feel that the storage has to be blazing fast, and 100% uptime
isn't paramount, however
On Sat, 2005-08-27 at 15:00 +1000, Daniel Pittman wrote:
Guy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
I've been working on a RAID setup with dual RAID controllers and
three expansion boxes - 48 disks in all, including data, parity and
global spares.
[...]
They don't feel that the storage
On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 19:21 -0400, Guy wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:linux-raid-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Stromberg
Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 3:01 PM
To: Linux RAID
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: number of global spares?