Re: remark and RFC

2006-08-18 Thread Gabor Gombas
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 08:28:07AM +0200, Peter T. Breuer wrote: > 1) if the network disk device has decided to shut down wholesale >(temporarily) because of lack of contact over the net, then >retries and writes are _bound_ to fail for a while, so there >is no point in sending them no

Re: Can you IMAGE Mirrored OS Drives?

2006-08-18 Thread Gabor Gombas
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 06:06:24AM -0400, andy liebman wrote: > There is absolutely NO PROBLEM making images of single disks and > restoring them to new disks (thus, creating clones). And it is very > fast. For an OS drive with about 4 GBs of data, it only takes about 5 > minutes to make the im

Re: Can you IMAGE Mirrored OS Drives?

2006-08-18 Thread Gabor Gombas
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 09:38:54AM +0200, Luca Berra wrote: > The only risk is if you ever move one disk from one machine to another. > To work around this you can change the uuid by recreating the array with > mdadm, No need to re-create, --update=uuid should be enough according to the man page.

Re: raid1 oops, 2.6.16

2006-08-18 Thread Paul Clements
Jason Lunz wrote: I just had a disk die in a 2.6.16 (debian kernel) raid1 server, and it's triggered an oops in raid1. We just saw this problem as well, on SUSE 2.6.16.21-0.8. However, it looks like the problem code still exists in at least 2.6.18-rc1, and I haven't seen any patches recently

Re: [bug?] raid1 integrity checking is broken on 2.6.18-rc4

2006-08-18 Thread raid
Neil introduced read-checking into 2.6.16. In versions prior, mirror copies were overwritten instead of checked. I'm running 2.6.17rc4: # echo "check" > /sys/block/md0/md/sync_action # dmesg md: syncing RAID array md0 md: minimum _guaranteed_ reconstruction speed: 1000 KB/sec/disc. md: using maxi

Re: raid5 grow problem

2006-08-18 Thread Justin Piszcz
Adding XFS mailing list to this e-mail to show that the grow for xfs worked. On Thu, 17 Aug 2006, ÊæÐÇ wrote: I've only tried growing a RAID5, which was the only RAID that I remember being supported (to grow) in the kernel, I am not sure if its posible to i know this,but how you grow your rai

Re: remark and RFC

2006-08-18 Thread Peter T. Breuer
"Also sprach ptb:" > 4) what the network device driver wants to do is be able to identify >the difference between primary requests and retries, and delay >retries (or repeat them internally) with some reasonable backoff >scheme to give them more chance of working in the face of a >