Re: RAID5 not being reassembled correctly after device swap

2007-07-02 Thread Michael Frotscher
On Monday 02 July 2007 00:12:14 Neil Brown wrote: Kernel logs from the boot would help here. Logs would help. Sure. The interesting part from dmesg is this: hdg: max request size: 512KiB hdg: 398297088 sectors (203928 MB) w/8192KiB Cache, CHS=24792/255/63, UDMA(100) hdg: cache flushes

Re: [linux-lvm] 2.6.22-rc5 XFS fails after hibernate/resume

2007-07-02 Thread Tejun Heo
David Greaves wrote: Tejun Heo wrote: It's really weird tho. The PHY RDY status changed events are coming from the device which is NOT used while resuming There is an obvious problem there though Tejun (the errors even when sda isn't involved in the OS boot) - can I start another thread

Re: [linux-lvm] 2.6.22-rc5 XFS fails after hibernate/resume

2007-07-02 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, 2 July 2007 12:56, Tejun Heo wrote: David Greaves wrote: Tejun Heo wrote: It's really weird tho. The PHY RDY status changed events are coming from the device which is NOT used while resuming There is an obvious problem there though Tejun (the errors even when sda isn't

Re: [linux-lvm] 2.6.22-rc5 XFS fails after hibernate/resume

2007-07-02 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, 2 July 2007 16:32, David Greaves wrote: Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Monday, 2 July 2007 12:56, Tejun Heo wrote: David Greaves wrote: Tejun Heo wrote: It's really weird tho. The PHY RDY status changed events are coming from the device which is NOT used while resuming There

Re: [linux-lvm] 2.6.22-rc5 XFS fails after hibernate/resume

2007-07-02 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, 2 July 2007 18:36, David Greaves wrote: Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Monday, 2 July 2007 16:32, David Greaves wrote: Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Monday, 2 July 2007 12:56, Tejun Heo wrote: David Greaves wrote: Tejun Heo wrote: It's really weird tho. The PHY RDY status

Re: Fastest Chunk Size w/XFS For MD Software RAID = 1024k

2007-07-02 Thread Mr. James W. Laferriere
Hello Justin ( all) , On Thu, 28 Jun 2007, Justin Piszcz wrote: On Thu, 28 Jun 2007, Peter Rabbitson wrote: Justin Piszcz wrote: On Thu, 28 Jun 2007, Peter Rabbitson wrote: Interesting, I came up with the same results (1M chunk being superior) with a completely different raid set