On Monday August 27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a few people who asked me this as well, RAID10 or similiar (SW). I
am not so sure, with RAID1 you can have your root disks on it and boot
from it using LILO/GRUB and it is proven pretty stable; can the same be
said about RAID10?
For
Neil Brown wrote:
On Monday August 27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a few people who asked me this as well, RAID10 or similiar (SW). I
am not so sure, with RAID1 you can have your root disks on it and boot
from it using LILO/GRUB and it is proven pretty stable; can the same be
said
On 8/27/07, Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael J. Evans wrote:
On Monday 27 August 2007, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:16:21 -0700 Michael J. Evans wrote:
=
--- linux/drivers/md/md.c.orig 2007-08-21
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, T. Eichstädt wrote:
Hello all,
thanks for your responses.
Quoting Bill Davidsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Neil Brown wrote:
On Monday August 27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a few people who asked me this as well, RAID10 or similiar (SW).
I am not so sure, with RAID1
On Aug 28 2007 06:08, Michael Evans wrote:
Oh, I see. I forgot about the changelogs. I'd send out version 5
now, but I'm not sure what kernel version to make the patch against.
2.6.23-rc4 is on kernel.org and I don't see any git snapshots.
2.6.23-rc4 is a snapshot in itself, a tagged one at
Hello all,
thanks for your responses.
Quoting Bill Davidsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Neil Brown wrote:
On Monday August 27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a few people who asked me this as well, RAID10 or similiar
(SW). I am not so sure, with RAID1 you can have your root disks
on it and
From: Michael J. Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In current release kernels the md module (Software RAID) uses a static array
(dev_t[128]) to store partition/device info temporarily for autostart.
This patch replaces that static array with a list.
Signed-off-by: Michael J. Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Dat Chu wrote:
md: sdd1 has invalid sb, not importing!
md: md_import_device returned -22
That is what I get for running dmesg | tail -20
I wouldn't expect the sb to matter, but you can zero it with mdadm if
you are dead sure that partition isn't be used for/by anything. I
suspect that
On 8/28/07, Bill Davidsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Evans wrote:
Oh, I see. I forgot about the changelogs. I'd send out version 5
now, but I'm not sure what kernel version to make the patch against.
2.6.23-rc4 is on kernel.org and I don't see any git snapshots.
Additionally I
On Tuesday 28 August 2007, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Aug 28 2007 06:08, Michael Evans wrote:
Oh, I see. I forgot about the changelogs. I'd send out version 5
now, but I'm not sure what kernel version to make the patch against.
2.6.23-rc4 is on kernel.org and I don't see any git snapshots.
Michael Evans wrote:
Oh, I see. I forgot about the changelogs. I'd send out version 5
now, but I'm not sure what kernel version to make the patch against.
2.6.23-rc4 is on kernel.org and I don't see any git snapshots.
Additionally I never could tell what git tree was the 'mainline' as it
isn't
Michael Evans wrote:
On 8/28/07, Bill Davidsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Evans wrote:
Oh, I see. I forgot about the changelogs. I'd send out version 5
now, but I'm not sure what kernel version to make the patch against.
2.6.23-rc4 is on kernel.org and I don't see any git snapshots.
On 8/28/07, Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Evans wrote:
On 8/28/07, Bill Davidsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Evans wrote:
Oh, I see. I forgot about the changelogs. I'd send out version 5
now, but I'm not sure what kernel version to make the patch against.
Michael Evans wrote:
On 8/28/07, Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Evans wrote:
On 8/28/07, Bill Davidsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Evans wrote:
Oh, I see. I forgot about the changelogs. I'd send out version 5
now, but I'm not sure what kernel version to make the patch
On 8/28/07, Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Evans wrote:
On 8/28/07, Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Evans wrote:
On 8/28/07, Bill Davidsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Evans wrote:
Oh, I see. I forgot about the changelogs. I'd send out version 5
now,
Michael Evans wrote:
On 8/28/07, Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Evans wrote:
On 8/28/07, Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Evans wrote:
On 8/28/07, Bill Davidsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Evans wrote:
Oh, I see. I forgot about the changelogs. I'd send
Hello folks,
We saw a particularly hard to reproduce bug in raid1_end_write_request that
we think the attached patch would catch. Now I'm wondering if anybody has seen
anything similar to this before us and is interested in getting a discussion going.
Best regards
--
Chris Eineke [EMAIL
Tomas France wrote:
This wouldn't be probably the best solution in my situation. The
computer we
are talking about will be quad-core web server with 8GB RAM and initially
2x500GB SATA HDDs setup in a RAID-1 array. When it begins running low on
space or more HDDs performance is needed, I plan to
Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Hi!
I have a four-disk Raid-10 array that I created and mount with mdadm.
It seems like every re-boot, either the array is not recognized
altogether, or one of the disks is not added. Manually adding using
mdadm works.
What superblock version and partition type
Justin Piszcz wrote:
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, T. Eichstädt wrote:
Hello all,
thanks for your responses.
Quoting Bill Davidsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Neil Brown wrote:
On Monday August 27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a few people who asked me this as well, RAID10 or similiar
(SW). I am
20 matches
Mail list logo
