On Tuesday October 30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Neil Brown wrote:
On Monday October 29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I bought two new hard drives to expand my raid array today and
unfortunately one of them appears to be bad. The problem didn't arise
Looks like you are in real trouble.
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 12:08:07AM -0500, Alberto Alonso wrote:
* Internal serverworks PATA controller on a netengine server. The
server if off waiting to get picked up, so I can't get the important
details.
1 PATA failure.
I was surprised on this one, I did have good luck
Which is the default type of superblock? 0.90 or 1.0?
On 10/30/07, Neil Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday October 26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone help me understand superblocks and MD a little bit?
I've got a raid5 array with 3 disks - sdb1, sdc1, sdd1.
--examine on
On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 07:55 +0100, Luca Berra wrote:
Well it might be a matter of personal preference, but i would prefer
an initrd doing just the minumum necessary to mount the root filesystem
(and/or activating resume from a swap device), and leaving all the rest
to initscripts, then an
On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 00:19 -0500, Alberto Alonso wrote:
On Sat, 2007-10-27 at 12:33 +0200, Samuel Tardieu wrote:
I agree with Doug: nothing prevents you from using md above very slow
drivers (such as remote disks or even a filesystem implemented over a
tape device to make it extreme). Only
On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 00:08 -0500, Alberto Alonso wrote:
On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 13:22 -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
OK, these you don't get to count. If you run raid over USB...well...you
get what you get. IDE never really was a proper server interface, and
SATA is much better, but USB was
Hello,
I have and olde HDD and two new HDDs:
- hda1 - my current root filesystem '/'
- sda1 - part of raid1 /dev/md0 [U_U]
- hdc1 - part of raid1 /dev/md0 [U_U]
I want all hda1, sda1, hdc1 to be a raid1. I remounted hda1 readonly
then I did 'dd if=/dev/hda1 of=/dev/md0'. I carefully checked
Janek Kozicki said: (by the date of Tue, 30 Oct 2007 21:07:21 +0100)
then I did 'dd if=/dev/hda1 of=/dev/md0'. I carefully checked that
the partition sizes match exactly. So now md0 contains the same thing
as hda1.
in fact, to check the size I was using 'fdisk -l' because it gives
size
On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 21:07 +0100, Janek Kozicki wrote:
Hello,
I have and olde HDD and two new HDDs:
- hda1 - my current root filesystem '/'
- sda1 - part of raid1 /dev/md0 [U_U]
- hdc1 - part of raid1 /dev/md0 [U_U]
I want all hda1, sda1, hdc1 to be a raid1. I remounted hda1 readonly
David Greaves wrote:
I read that he aborted it, then removed both drives before giving md a chance
to
restart.
He said:
After several minutes dmesg indicated that mdadm gave up and
the grow process stopped. After googling around I tried the solutions
that seemed most likely to work,
10 matches
Mail list logo
