Janek Kozicki wrote:
> Michael Tokarev said: (by the date of Fri, 21 Dec 2007 14:53:38 +0300)
>
>>> I just noticed that with Linux software RAID10, disk
>>> usage isn't equal at all, that is, most reads are
>>> done from the first part of mirror(s) only.
>
> what's your kernel version? I recall t
Michael Tokarev said: (by the date of Fri, 21 Dec 2007 14:53:38 +0300)
> > I just noticed that with Linux software RAID10, disk
> > usage isn't equal at all, that is, most reads are
> > done from the first part of mirror(s) only.
what's your kernel version? I recall that recently there have b
Michael Tokarev wrote:
> I just noticed that with Linux software RAID10, disk
> usage isn't equal at all, that is, most reads are
> done from the first part of mirror(s) only.
>
> Attached (disk-hour.png) is a little graph demonstrating
> this (please don't blame me for poor choice of colors and
>
Mattias Wadenstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There are those that have run Linux MD RAID on thumpers before. I
> vaguely recall some driver issues (unrelated to MD) that made it less
> suitable than solaris, but that might be fixed in recent kernels.
I think that was mainly an issue for peopl
Norman Elton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We're investigating the possibility of running Linux (RHEL) on top of
> Sun's X4500 Thumper box:
>
> http://www.sun.com/servers/x64/x4500/
I think BNL's evalation of Solaris/ZFS vs. Linux/MD on a thumper
might be of interest:
http://hepix.caspur.it/s
