[BUGREPORT] The kernel thread for md RAID10 could cause a md RAID10 array deadlock

2008-02-13 Thread K.Tanaka
This message describes another issue about md-RAID10 found by testing the 2.6.24 md RAID10 using new scsi fault injection framework. Abstract: When a scsi command timeout occurs during RAID10 recovery, the kernel threads for md RAID10 could cause a md RAID10 array deadlock. The nr_pending flag

Re: Got raid10 assembled wrong - how to fix?

2008-02-13 Thread Michael Tokarev
George Spelvin wrote: I just discovered (the hard way, sigh, but not too much data loss) that a 4-drive RAID 10 array had the mirroring set up incorrectly. Given 4 drvies A, B, C and D, I had intended to mirror A-C and B-D, so that I could split the mirror and run on either (A,B) or (C,D).

Re: transferring RAID-1 drives via sneakernet

2008-02-13 Thread Michael Tokarev
Jeff Breidenbach wrote: It's not a RAID issue, but make sure you don't have any duplicate volume names. According to Murphy's Law, if there are two / volumes, the wrong one will be chosen upon your next reboot. Thanks for the tip. Since I'm not using volumes or LVM at all, I should be safe

Re: transferring RAID-1 drives via sneakernet

2008-02-13 Thread David Greaves
Jeff Breidenbach wrote: It's not a RAID issue, but make sure you don't have any duplicate volume names. According to Murphy's Law, if there are two / volumes, the wrong one will be chosen upon your next reboot. Thanks for the tip. Since I'm not using volumes or LVM at all, I should be safe