Hi!
FWIW, I'm on record stating that sync is not sufficient to quiesce an XFS
filesystem for a suspend/resume to work safely and have argued that the only
Hmm, so XFS writes to disk even when its threads are frozen?
safe thing to do is freeze the filesystem before suspend and thaw it after
On Thu 2007-06-28 17:27:34, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, 27 June 2007 22:49, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
FWIW, I'm on record stating that sync is not sufficient to quiesce an
XFS
filesystem for a suspend/resume to work safely and have argued that the
only
Hmm, so XFS
Hi!
Is it highmem-related? Can you try it with mem=256M?
Bad idea, the kernel crashes burns when I use mem=256, I had to boot
2.6.20-rc5-6 single to get back into my machine, very nasty. Remember I
use an onboard graphics controller that has 128MB of RAM allocated to it
and I believe
On Sun 2007-01-21 14:27:34, Justin Piszcz wrote:
Why does copying an 18GB on a 74GB raptor raid1 cause the kernel to invoke
the OOM killer and kill all of my processes?
Doing this on a single disk 2.6.19.2 is OK, no issues. However, this
happens every time!
Anything to try? Any other
On Mon 2007-01-22 13:48:44, Justin Piszcz wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007, Pavel Machek wrote:
On Sun 2007-01-21 14:27:34, Justin Piszcz wrote:
Why does copying an 18GB on a 74GB raptor raid1 cause the kernel to
invoke
the OOM killer and kill all of my processes?
Doing
Hi!
If there's a swap file on a software RAID, it should be possible to use
this
file for saving the swsusp's suspend image. Also, this file should be
available to the memory management subsystem when memory is being freed
before
the suspend image is created.
For the
Hi!
If there's a swap file on a software RAID, it should be possible to use this
file for saving the swsusp's suspend image. Also, this file should be
available to the memory management subsystem when memory is being freed before
the suspend image is created.
For the above reasons it
Hi!
On Wednesday September 27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was just wondering if the issues with swap on a raid device and with using a
journaling fs on a raid device had been fixed in the latest 2.4.0-test
kernels?
Yes. md in 2.4 doesn't do interesting things with the
