Re: [patch] install a static build

2006-05-28 Thread Neil Brown
On Sunday May 28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Luca, maybe you better add an install-static target. you're right, that would be a cleaner approach. I've don so, and while doing so added install-tcc, install-ulibc, install-klibc too. And while I'm busy in the Makefile anyway I've made

[patch] install a static build

2006-05-27 Thread Dirk Jagdmann
Hello developers, after building my static mdadm I wanted to install it via make install, but had to tweak the Makefile a little. However my approach is not the best, since I had to remove the rmconf target for the static build, issue a cp of the mdadm.static binary and my patch might interfere

Re: [patch] install a static build

2006-05-27 Thread Luca Berra
On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 12:08:19PM +0200, Dirk Jagdmann wrote: Hello developers, after building my static mdadm I wanted to install it via make install, but had to tweak the Makefile a little. However my approach is not the best, since I had to remove the rmconf target for the static build,

Re: [patch] install a static build

2006-05-27 Thread Dirk Jagdmann
Hello Luca, maybe you better add an install-static target. you're right, that would be a cleaner approach. I've don so, and while doing so added install-tcc, install-ulibc, install-klibc too. And while I'm busy in the Makefile anyway I've made a third patch which adds the uninstall: target