Re: Interesting RAID checking observations

2006-09-21 Thread linux
But anyway, it's better, so thank you! I haven't rebooted the celeron I hung for the duration of a RAID-1 check, so I haven't checked that with 2.6.18 yet. Followup: 2.6.18 installed and tested; no change. The machine still goes away for the duration if three RAID-1 checks are run in

Re: Interesting RAID checking observations

2006-09-21 Thread Rob Bray
Just to follow up my speed observations last month on a 6x SATA - 3x PCIe - AMD64 system, as of 2.6.18 final, RAID-10 checking is running at a reasonable ~156 MB/s (which I presume means 312 MB/s of reads), and raid5 is better than the 23 MB/s I complained about earlier, but still a bit

Re: Interesting RAID checking observations - I'm getting it too

2006-09-08 Thread Mark Smith
Hi Bill, On Mon, 04 Sep 2006 12:42:53 -0400 Bill Davidsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mark Smith wrote: Interesting, but do you run other stuff at that time? Several distributions run various things in the middle of the night which really bog the machine. Doesn't look like it.

Re: Interesting RAID checking observations - I'm getting it too

2006-09-04 Thread Bill Davidsen
Mark Smith wrote: Just a note, I've noticed this problem too. I run a RAID1 check once every 24 hours, and while developing the script to do it, noticed that the machine became virtually unusable - mouse was jumpy, typing lagged. I run this check every morning at 4.00am so I'm usually

Re: Interesting RAID checking observations

2006-09-04 Thread Bill Davidsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't think the processor is saturating. I've seen reports of this sort of thing before and until recently had no idea what was happening, couldn't reproduce it, and couldn't think of any more useful data to collect. Well I can reproduce it easily enough.

Re: Interesting RAID checking observations

2006-09-04 Thread linux
I'd like to note that the symptoms include not even being able to *type* at the console, which I thought was all in-kernel code, not subject to being swapped out. But whatever. Really? Or is it just that you can type but the characters don't get echoed. The type part is in the kernel, but

Re: Interesting RAID checking observations - I'm getting it too

2006-09-04 Thread Mark Smith
Hi Bill, On Mon, 04 Sep 2006 12:42:53 -0400 Bill Davidsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mark Smith wrote: Just a note, I've noticed this problem too. I run a RAID1 check once every 24 hours, and while developing the script to do it, noticed that the machine became virtually unusable -

Interesting RAID checking observations - I'm getting it too

2006-08-30 Thread Mark Smith
Just a note, I've noticed this problem too. I run a RAID1 check once every 24 hours, and while developing the script to do it, noticed that the machine became virtually unusable - mouse was jumpy, typing lagged. I run this check every morning at 4.00am so I'm usually asleep and don't notice it,

Re: Interesting RAID checking observations

2006-08-28 Thread linux
The PCI bus is only capable of 133MB/s max. Unless you have dedicated SATA ports, each on its own PCI-e bus, you will not get speeds in excess of 133MB/s, 200MB/s+ I have read reports of someone using 4-5 SATA controllers (SiI 3112 cards on PCI-e x1 ports) and they got around 200MB/s or

Re: Interesting RAID checking observations

2006-08-28 Thread linux
I don't think the processor is saturating. I've seen reports of this sort of thing before and until recently had no idea what was happening, couldn't reproduce it, and couldn't think of any more useful data to collect. Well I can reproduce it easily enough. It's a production server, but I

Interesting RAID checking observations

2006-08-27 Thread linux
Two discoveries: first, I locked up my machine, and second, it's surprisingly slow. I think the former is pilot error, and not a bug, but after applying the raid-1 check patch (cherry-picked from the v2.6.18-rc4-mm3 tree at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/smurf/linux-trees.git) to a

Re: Interesting RAID checking observations

2006-08-27 Thread Justin Piszcz
Second, trying checks on a fast (2.2 GHz AMD64) machine, I'm surprised at how slow it is: The PCI bus is only capable of 133MB/s max. Unless you have dedicated SATA ports, each on its own PCI-e bus, you will not get speeds in excess of 133MB/s, 200MB/s+ I have read reports of someone using