Hello Neil,
Thanks for the confirmations!
It's all very clear now. Case closed.
Best,
Seb.
On Sat, 21 Jul 2007, Neil Brown wrote:
| On Saturday July 21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
| Hi Neil,
|
|
| | Could you tell me if such a mechanism exists in mdadm?
| | Or should I accept the
Dear all,
First I'd like to thank you for the great work you've done with mdadm.
It's flexible, powerful and reasonably easy to use.
I have a question that seems both important for the redundancy of my RAID6
devices and too sharp for me, my friends and the newsgroup
fr.comp.stockage . I think
On Fri Jul 20, 2007 at 07:54:54PM +0200, Seb wrote:
But the number of blocks cannot be imposed when creating a partition,
only the number of cylinders.
If you hit u in fdisk then you can create partitions by sector rather
than by cylinder.
HTH,
Robin
--
___
( ' }
On Friday July 20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you tell me if such a mechanism exists in mdadm?
Or should I accept the loss of the 150 GB?
When you give mdadm a collection of drives to turn into a RAID array,
use bases the size of the array on the smallest device.
You might want to make
