Re: high mismatch count after scrub

2007-03-07 Thread Dexter Filmore
> Neil, > > So in his case, is there anyway to determine which files are potentially > corrupted? I'd like to know that, too... -- -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GCS d--(+)@ s-:+ a- C UL++ P+>++ L+++> E-- W++ N o? K- w--(---) !O M+ V- PS+ PE Y++ PGP t++(---)@ 5 X+(++) R+(+

Re: high mismatch count after scrub

2007-03-06 Thread Justin Piszcz
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007, Dexter Filmore wrote: xerxes:/sys/block/md0/md# cat mismatch_cnt 147248 Need to worry? If you have a swap file on this array, then that could explain it, so don't worry. Nope, swap is not on the array. Couple of loops tho. If not... maybe worry? I assume you did a '

Re: high mismatch count after scrub

2007-03-06 Thread Dexter Filmore
> > xerxes:/sys/block/md0/md# cat mismatch_cnt > > 147248 > > Need to worry? > > If you have a swap file on this array, then that could explain it, so > don't worry. Nope, swap is not on the array. Couple of loops tho. > > If not... maybe worry? > > I assume you did a 'check' or 'repair' before l

Re: high mismatch count after scrub

2007-03-05 Thread Neil Brown
On Tuesday March 6, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > So I practiced what I learned today and scrubbed the array. > Getting this: > > xerxes:/sys/block/md0/md# cat mismatch_cnt > 147248 > > 4x 250GB Samsung sATA, smartctl says all fine. > > Need to worry? > If you have a swap file on this array, then

high mismatch count after scrub

2007-03-05 Thread Dexter Filmore
So I practiced what I learned today and scrubbed the array. Getting this: xerxes:/sys/block/md0/md# cat mismatch_cnt 147248 4x 250GB Samsung sATA, smartctl says all fine. Need to worry? -- -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GCS d--(+)@ s-:+ a- C UL++ P+>++ L+++> E-- W++ N o