On 4/7/06, Neil Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday April 7, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Seeing this hasn't made it into a released kernel yet, I might just
> > change it. But I'll have to make sure that old mdadm's don't mess
> > things up ... I wonder how I will do that :-(
> >
> >
On Friday April 7, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Seeing this hasn't made it into a released kernel yet, I might just
> change it. But I'll have to make sure that old mdadm's don't mess
> things up ... I wonder how I will do that :-(
>
> Thanks for the report.
Yes, try 2.4.1 (just released).
Tha
On Thursday April 6, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> When I try to create a RAID1 array with ver 1.0 superblock using mdadm
> > 2.2 I'm getting:
> WARNING - superblock isn't sized correctly
>
> Looking at the code (and adding a bit more debugging) it is clear that
> all 3 checks fail in super1.c's calc
When I try to create a RAID1 array with ver 1.0 superblock using mdadm
> 2.2 I'm getting:
WARNING - superblock isn't sized correctly
Looking at the code (and adding a bit more debugging) it is clear that
all 3 checks fail in super1.c's calc_sb_1_csum()'s "make sure I can
count..." test.
Is this a
