On Tuesday 29 January 2008 20:13, Peter Rabbitson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Russell Coker wrote:
> > Are there plans for supporting a NVRAM write-back cache with Linux
> > software RAID?
>
> AFAIK even today you can place the bitmap in an external file residing on a
> file system which in turn
Russell Coker wrote:
Are there plans for supporting a NVRAM write-back cache with Linux software
RAID?
AFAIK even today you can place the bitmap in an external file residing on a
file system which in turn can reside on the nvram...
Peter
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "uns
stripes, and the NVRAM cache removes the need for write-intent
bitmaps. AFAIK Linux software RAID doesn't support such things and that
putting filesystem journals and the write-intent bitmap blocks on NVRAM
devices is the best that you could achieve.
It seems that if you want the best perfor
On Sunday 27 January 2008 22:21, Neil Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday January 27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2008/01/msg00921.html
> >
> > Are they regarded as a stable feature? If so I'd like to see
> > distributions supporting them by default.
On Sunday January 27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2008/01/msg00921.html
>
> Are they regarded as a stable feature? If so I'd like to see distributions
> supporting them by default. I've started a discussion in Debian on this
> topic, see the above URL for de
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2008/01/msg00921.html
Are they regarded as a stable feature? If so I'd like to see distributions
supporting them by default. I've started a discussion in Debian on this
topic, see the above URL for details.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://etbe.coker.com.au/
