On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 06:29:01PM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> Neil Brown writes:
> > On Monday February 26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Actually, the LVM metadata is somewhat poorly layed out in this respect.
> > > The metadata is at the start of the device, and on occasion is not even
> >
Neil Brown writes:
> On Monday February 26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Actually, the LVM metadata is somewhat poorly layed out in this respect.
> > The metadata is at the start of the device, and on occasion is not even
> > sector aligned, AFAICS.
>
> MD/RAID volumes are always a multiple of 64
On Monday February 26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Actually, the LVM metadata is somewhat poorly layed out in this respect.
> The metadata is at the start of the device, and on occasion is not even
> sector aligned, AFAICS. Also, the PE structures, while large powers of
> 2 in size, are not gua
On February 27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Quoting Neil Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > On February 26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > I'm currently running a standard v2.2.17 kernel w/ the 'accompanying'
> > > raid system (linear).
> >
> > Given this, you should be able to run mkraid with co
I try to set 3 disks in raid 5.
But i have a problem, I lose data when i remove a disk.
I have done the following steps :
* I created partitions on the three disks :
on sdb : sdb1 and sdb2 both primary and FD type
on sdc : sdc1 and sdc2
on sdd : sdd1 and sdd2
all partitions of
Quoting Neil Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On February 26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I'm currently running a standard v2.2.17 kernel w/ the 'accompanying'
> > raid system (linear).
>
> Given this, you should be able to run mkraid with complete safety as
> is doesn't actually write anything to
