Andy Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 12:55:47PM +1100, Christopher Smith wrote:
Why would you use RAID6 and not RAID10 with four disks ?
I was wondering the same thing. It's true that RAID6 is guaranteed
to still run degraded after losing 2 devices, whereas a RAID10
On Monday December 19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Neil Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: JaniD++ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 1:57 AM
Subject: Re: RAID5 resync question BUGREPORT!
How big is your array?
On Tuesday November 22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have already try the all available options, including readahead in all
layer (result in earlyer mails), and chunksize.
But with this settings, i cannot workaround this.
And the result is incomprehensible for me!
The raid0 performance is not
