On Fri, 2006-11-03 at 17:57 +1100, Neil Brown wrote:
On Thursday November 2, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 23:32 +1100, Neil Brown wrote:
We couldn't think of any use of an offline event. So we removed the
event when the device-mapper device is suspended.
Should
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 02:39:31PM +1100, Neil Brown wrote:
mdadm could probably be changed to be able to remove the device
anyway. The only difficulty is: how do you tell it which device to
remove, given that there is no name in /dev to use.
Suggestions?
Major:minor? If /sys/block still
On Oct 26, 7:25am, Neil Brown wrote:
} Subject: Re: RAID5 refuses to accept replacement drive.
Hi Neil, hope the end of the week is going well for you.
On Wednesday October 25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good morning to everyone, hope everyone's day is going well.
Neil, I sent this to
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006, martin f krafft wrote:
Hi,
I cannot find authoritative information about the relation between
the RAID chunk size and the correct stride parameter to use when
creating an ext2/3 filesystem.
you know, it's interesting -- mkfs.xfs somehow gets the right sunit/swidth
