From: Iustin Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This patch exposes the uuid and the degraded status of an assembled
array through sysfs.
The uuid is useful in the case when multiple arrays exist on a system
and userspace needs to identify them; currently, the only portable way
that I know of is using 'mdadm
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc6 compared to 2.6.19
with patches available.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any oth
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc6 compared to 2.6.19
that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 10:54:09AM -0500, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> > On Sun, 21 Jan 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > From: Justin Piszcz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Date: Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 04:03:42PM -0500
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > My swap is on,
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 10:54:09AM -0500, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Jan 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > From: Justin Piszcz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 04:03:42PM -0500
> > >
> > >
> > > My swap is on, 2GB ram and 2GB of swap on this machine. I can't go back
Just re-ran the test 4-5 times, could not reproduce this one, but I'll
keep running this kernel w/patch for a while and see if it happens again.
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jan 2007 18:37:15 -0500 (EST)
> Justin Piszcz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Without diggin
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jan 2007 18:37:15 -0500 (EST)
> Justin Piszcz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Without digging too deeply, I'd say you've hit the same bug Sami Farin and
> > > others
> > > have reported starting with 2.6.19: pages mapped with kmap_atomic
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007 18:37:15 -0500 (EST)
Justin Piszcz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Without digging too deeply, I'd say you've hit the same bug Sami Farin and
> > others
> > have reported starting with 2.6.19: pages mapped with kmap_atomic() become
> > unmapped
> > during memcpy() or similar ope
