Law, if there are two / volumes, the wrong
one will be chosen upon your next reboot.
--
Brendan Conoboy / Red Hat, Inc. / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-raid in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http
ext3 on time, remember to use the stride option when making
the filesystem.
Are we crazy to think this is even possible?
Crazy, possible, and fun!
--
Brendan Conoboy / Red Hat, Inc. / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-raid in
the body
controller, try
balancing the drives between the two to get a larger combined pipe.
Good luck,
--
Brendan Conoboy / Red Hat, Inc. / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-raid in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http
your space vs. reliability needs.
--
Brendan Conoboy / Red Hat, Inc. / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-raid in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes, sorry, ultra 320 wide.
Exactly how many channels and drives?
--
Brendan Conoboy / Red Hat, Inc. / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-raid in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http
Ming Zhang wrote:
Why can't you just mark that drive as failed, remove it and hotadd a
new drive to replace the failed drive?
because background rebuild is slower than disk to disk copy, since his
disk is still fully functional.
Wouldn't it be great if every disk in a RAID volume were in its
