On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 09:16:03PM +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
Document in Documentation/md.txt the files that now appear in sysfs,
and make a couple of small refinements to exactly when 'level' and
'raid_disks' are empty, to make it match the documentation.
Signed-off-by: Neil Brown [EMAIL
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 09:15:55PM +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
The current sync_action for an array can be one of
idle - nothing happening
resync - reduncancy being recalcualted
recover - missing device being recoverred to spare
check - user initiated check of redundancy
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 04:52:08PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
I'm putting the final touches on kinit, which is the user-space
replacement (based on klibc) for the whole in-kernel root-mount complex.
Pretty much the one thing remaining -- other than lots of testing --
is to handle
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 10:05:26AM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
patch for 2.6.17 stable series.
Thanks,
NeilBrown
### Comments for Changeset
At the point where this 'atomic_add' is, rdev could be NULL,
as seen by the fact that we test for this in the very next
statement.
Further is it is
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 02:24:45PM +0200, Leon Woestenberg wrote:
Hello all,
On 9/13/06, Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ric Wheeler wrote:
Leon Woestenberg wrote:
In short, I use ext3 over /dev/md0 over 4 SATA drives /dev/sd[a-d]
each driven by libata ahci. I unplug then replug the
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Neil Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If a drive is added with HOT_ADD_DISK rather than ADD_NEW_DISK,
saved_raid_disk isn't initialised properly, and the drive can be
included in the array without a resync.
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 05:00:46PM +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
This allows udev to do something intelligent when an
array becomes available.
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Neil Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 05:00:40PM +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
Following are 6 patches for md in -lastest which I have been sitting
on for a while because I hadn't had a chance to test them properly.
I now have so there shouldn't be too many bugs left :-)
First is suitable for 2.6.19 (if it
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 12:29:51PM -0500, Justin Piszcz wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jan 2007, Justin Piszcz wrote:
Good luck,
Jurriaan
--
What does ELF stand for (in respect to Linux?)
ELF is the first rock group that Ronnie James Dio performed with back in
the early
From: NeilBrown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There are two errors that can lead to recovery problems with raid10
when used in 'far' more (not the default).
Due to a '' instead of '=' the wrong block is located which would
result in garbage being written to some random location, quite
possible outside the
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Neil Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If 'num_pages' were ever 1 more than a multiple of 8 (32bit platforms)
for of 16 (64 bit platforms). filemap_attr would be allocated one
'unsigned long' shorter than
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
1/ When resyncing a degraded raid10 which has more than 2 copies of each block,
garbage can get synced on top of good data.
2/ We round the wrong way in part of the device size calculation, which
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Mike Accetta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If raid1/repair (which reads all block and fixes any differences
it finds) hits a read error, it doesn't reset the bio for writing
before writing correct data back,
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 05:15:27PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
It appears that a couple of bugs slipped in to md for 2.6.23.
These two patches fix them and are appropriate for 2.6.23.y as well
as 2.6.24-rcX
Thanks,
NeilBrown
[PATCH 001 of 2] md: Fix an unsigned compare to allow creation
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 04:22:14PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 05:15:27PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
It appears that a couple of bugs slipped in to md for 2.6.23.
These two patches fix them and are appropriate for 2.6.23.y as well
as 2.6.24-rcX
Thanks,
NeilBrown
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 08:36:05PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
On Nov 13, 2007 5:23 PM, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 04:22:14PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 05:15:27PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
It appears that a couple of bugs slipped
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 10:36:30PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
On Nov 13, 2007 8:43 PM, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Careful, it looks like you cherry picked commit 4ae3f847 md: raid5:
fix clearing of biofill operations which ended up misapplied in
Linus' tree, You should either
17 matches
Mail list logo
