On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 23:21 -0700, Neil Brown wrote:
> On Saturday October 6, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Neil,
> >
> > Here is the latest spin of the 'stripe_queue' implementation.
> Thanks to
> > raid6+bitmap testing done by Mr. James W. Laferriere there have been
> > several cleanups and fixes
On Saturday October 6, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Neil,
>
> Here is the latest spin of the 'stripe_queue' implementation. Thanks to
> raid6+bitmap testing done by Mr. James W. Laferriere there have been
> several cleanups and fixes since the last release. Also, the changes
> are now spread over
On Saturday October 6, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> These patches & data look very impressive, do we have an ETA of when they
> will be merged into mainline?
>
> Justin.
If you or others could test and confirm similar improvements, that
would be a big help.
But as always, the answer is "when th
On 10/6/07, Justin Piszcz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 6 Oct 2007, Dan Williams wrote:
>
> > Neil,
> >
> > Here is the latest spin of the 'stripe_queue' implementation. Thanks to
> > raid6+bitmap testing done by Mr. James W. Laferriere there have been
> > several cleanups and fixes sin
On Sat, 6 Oct 2007, Dan Williams wrote:
Neil,
Here is the latest spin of the 'stripe_queue' implementation. Thanks to
raid6+bitmap testing done by Mr. James W. Laferriere there have been
several cleanups and fixes since the last release. Also, the changes
are now spread over 4 patches to is
Neil,
Here is the latest spin of the 'stripe_queue' implementation. Thanks to
raid6+bitmap testing done by Mr. James W. Laferriere there have been
several cleanups and fixes since the last release. Also, the changes
are now spread over 4 patches to isolate one conceptual change per
patch. The m
