Neil Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Monday February 7, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > NeilBrown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > + retry:
> > > sh = get_active_stripe(conf, new_sector, pd_idx,
> > > (bi->bi_rw&RWA_MASK));
> > > if (sh) {
> > > -
>
On Monday February 7, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> NeilBrown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > + retry:
> > sh = get_active_stripe(conf, new_sector, pd_idx,
> > (bi->bi_rw&RWA_MASK));
> > if (sh) {
> > -
> > - while (!add_stripe_bio(sh, bi, dd_idx,
> >
NeilBrown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> + retry:
> sh = get_active_stripe(conf, new_sector, pd_idx,
> (bi->bi_rw&RWA_MASK));
> if (sh) {
> -
> -while (!add_stripe_bio(sh, bi, dd_idx,
> (bi->bi_rw&RW_MASK))) {
> -/
If we detect an overlap, we set a flag and wait for a wakeup.
When requests are handled, if the flag was set, we perform the
wakeup.
Note that the code currently in -mm is badly broken. With this
patch applied, it passes tests the use O_DIRECT to cause lots
of overlapping requests.
Signed-off-b
