Hi Dan,
On 02.11.2007, 3:36:50 you wrote:
I am preparing a new patch that replaces ASYNC_TX_DEP_ACK with
ASYNC_TX_CHAIN_ACK. The plan is to make the entire chain of
dependencies available up until the last transaction is submitted.
This allows the entire dependency chain to be walked at
Hi Dan,
On Friday 02 November 2007 03:36, Dan Williams wrote:
This is happened because of the specific implementation of
dma_wait_for_async_tx().
So I take it you are not implementing interrupt based callbacks in your
driver?
Why not ? I have interrupt based callbacks in my driver.
Hi Dan,
Honestly I tried to fix this quickly using the approach similar to proposed
by you, with one addition though (in fact, deletion of BUG_ON(chan ==
tx-chan) in async_tx_run_dependencies()). And this led to Kernel stack
overflow. This happened because of the recurseve calling
On 11/1/07, Yuri Tikhonov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Dan,
Honestly I tried to fix this quickly using the approach similar to proposed
by you, with one addition though (in fact, deletion of BUG_ON(chan ==
tx-chan) in async_tx_run_dependencies()). And this led to Kernel stack
overflow.
