Re: New FAQ entry? (was IBM xSeries stop responding during RAID1 reconstruction)

2006-06-22 Thread Niccolo Rigacci
  personally, I don't see any point to worrying about the default,
  compile-time or boot time:
  
  for f in `find /sys/block/* -name scheduler`; do echo cfq  $f; done

I tested this case:

- reboot as per power failure (RAID goes dirty)
- RAID start resyncing as soon as the kernel assemble it
- every disk activity is blocked, even DHCP failed!
- host services are unavailable

This is why I changed the kernel default.

-- 
Niccolo Rigacci
Firenze - Italy

Iraq, missione di pace: 38475 morti - www.iraqbodycount.net
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-raid in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: New FAQ entry? (was IBM xSeries stop responding during RAID1 reconstruction)

2006-06-22 Thread Bill Davidsen

Niccolo Rigacci wrote:


personally, I don't see any point to worrying about the default,
compile-time or boot time:

for f in `find /sys/block/* -name scheduler`; do echo cfq  $f; done
 



I tested this case:

- reboot as per power failure (RAID goes dirty)
- RAID start resyncing as soon as the kernel assemble it
- every disk activity is blocked, even DHCP failed!
- host services are unavailable

This is why I changed the kernel default.

 

Changing on the command line assumes that you built all of the 
schedulers in... but making that assumption, perhaps the correct 
fail-safe is to have cfq as the default, and at the end of rc.local 
check for rebuild, and if everything is clean change to whatever work 
best at the end of the boot. If the raid is not clean stay with cfq.


Has anyone tried deadline for this? I think I had this as deafult and 
didn't hand on a raid5 fail/rebuild.


--
bill davidsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 CTO TMR Associates, Inc
 Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-raid in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


New FAQ entry? (was IBM xSeries stop responding during RAID1 reconstruction)

2006-06-21 Thread Niccolo Rigacci
Thanks to the several guys in this list, I have solved my problem 
and elaborated this, can be a new FAQ entry?



Q: Sometimes when a RAID volume is resyncing, the system seems to 
locks-up: every disk activity is blocked until resync is done.

A: This is not strictly related to Linux RAID, this is a problem 
related to the Linux kernel and the disk subsytem: in no 
circumstances a process should get all the disk resources 
preventing others to access them.

You can control the max speed at which RAID reconstruction is 
done by setting it, say at 5 Mb/s:

  echo 5000  /proc/sys/dev/raid/speed_limit_max

This is just a workaround, you have to determine the max speed 
that does not lock your system by trial and error and you cannot 
predict what will be the disk load in the future when the RAID 
will be resyncing for some reason.

Starting from version 2.6, Linux kernel has several choices about 
the I/O scheduler to be used. The default is the anticipatory 
scheduler, which seems to be sub-optimal on resync high load. If 
your kernel has the CFQ scheduler compiled in, use it during 
resync.

From the command line you can see which schedulers are supported 
and change it on the fly (remember to do it for each RAID disk):

  # cat /sys/block/hda/queue/scheduler
  noop [anticipatory] deadline cfq
  # echo cfq  /sys/block/hda/queue/scheduler

Otherwise you can recompile your kernel and set CFQ as the 
default I/O scheduler (CONFIG_DEFAULT_CFQ=y in Block layer, IO 
Schedulers, Default I/O scheduler).


-- 
Niccolo Rigacci
Firenze - Italy

Iraq, missione di pace: 38475 morti - www.iraqbodycount.net
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-raid in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: New FAQ entry? (was IBM xSeries stop responding during RAID1 reconstruction)

2006-06-21 Thread Michael Tokarev
Niccolo Rigacci wrote:
[]
 From the command line you can see which schedulers are supported 
 and change it on the fly (remember to do it for each RAID disk):
 
   # cat /sys/block/hda/queue/scheduler
   noop [anticipatory] deadline cfq
   # echo cfq  /sys/block/hda/queue/scheduler
 
 Otherwise you can recompile your kernel and set CFQ as the 
 default I/O scheduler (CONFIG_DEFAULT_CFQ=y in Block layer, IO 
 Schedulers, Default I/O scheduler).

There's much easier/simpler way to set default scheduler.  As
someone suggested, RTFM Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt.
Passing elevator=cfq (or whatever) will do the trick much simpler
than kernel recompile.

/mjt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-raid in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: New FAQ entry? (was IBM xSeries stop responding during RAID1 reconstruction)

2006-06-21 Thread Mark Hahn
 There's much easier/simpler way to set default scheduler.  As

personally, I don't see any point to worrying about the default,
compile-time or boot time:

for f in `find /sys/block/* -name scheduler`; do echo cfq  $f; done

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-raid in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: New FAQ entry? (was IBM xSeries stop responding during RAID1 reconstruction)

2006-06-21 Thread Gil
Mark Hahn wrote:
 There's much easier/simpler way to set default scheduler.  As
 
 personally, I don't see any point to worrying about the default,
 compile-time or boot time:
 
 for f in `find /sys/block/* -name scheduler`; do echo cfq  $f; done

I agree -- if you're talking about changing the io scheduler for the
duration of a resync you should take this approach rather than
changing kernels or rebooting.

--Gil
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-raid in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html