Paul Clements wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
One of the advantages of mirroring is that if there is heavy read load
when one drive is busy there is another copy of the data on the other
drive(s). But doing 1MB reads on the mirrored device did not show that
the kernel took advantage of this in
Lars Roland wrote:
I have created a stripe across two 500Gb disks located on separate IDE
channels using:
mdadm -Cv /dev/md0 -c32 -n2 -l0 /dev/hdb /dev/hdd
the performance is awful on both kernel 2.6.12.5 and 2.6.14.2 (even
with hdparm and blockdev tuning), both bonnie++ and hdparm (included
Bill Davidsen wrote:
One of the advantages of mirroring is that if there is heavy read load
when one drive is busy there is another copy of the data on the other
drive(s). But doing 1MB reads on the mirrored device did not show that
the kernel took advantage of this in any way. In fact, it
