Peter T. Breuer wrote:
[]
The patch was originally developed for 2.4, then ported to 2.6.3, and
then to 2.6.8.1. Neil has recently been doing stuff, so I don't
think it applies cleanly to 2.6.10, but somebody WAS porting it for me
until they found that 2.6.10 didn't support their hardware ... and
Michael Tokarev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[-- text/plain, encoding 7bit, charset: KOI8-R, 74 lines --]
Peter T. Breuer wrote:
[]
The patch was originally developed for 2.4, then ported to 2.6.3, and
then to 2.6.8.1. Neil has recently been doing stuff, so I don't
think it applies cleanly
Peter T. Breuer wrote:
Michael Tokarev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[-- text/plain, encoding 7bit, charset: KOI8-R, 74 lines --]
Uh-oh. Setting proper charset this time. What a nonsense:
7bit but koi8... ;)
[]
Uh OK. As I recall one only needs to count, one doesn't need a bitwise
map of what one has
Michael Tokarev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Uh OK. As I recall one only needs to count, one doesn't need a bitwise
map of what one has dealt with.
Well. I see read_balance() is now used to resubmit reads. There's
a reason to use it instead of choosing next disk, I think.
I can't think of
Peter T. Breuer wrote:
Michael Tokarev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[]
But your approach is fine - it's just that (a) I don't like to mess
with the struct sizes, as that makes modules binary incompatible,
instead of just having extra functionalities, and (b) I really think
it's not going to be easily
I'd like to try this patch
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-raidm=110704868115609w=2 with
EVMS BBR.
Has anyone tried it on 2.6.10 (with FC2 1.9 and EVMS patches)? Has
anyone tried the rewrite part at all? I don't know md or the kernel or
this patch, but the following lines of the patch
J. David Beutel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to try this patch
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-raidm=110704868115609w=2 with
EVMS BBR.
Has anyone tried it on 2.6.10 (with FC2 1.9 and EVMS patches)? Has
anyone tried the rewrite part at all? I don't know md or the kernel or
Hi,
I noticed the discussion about robust read on the RAID list and similar one
on the EVMS list so I am sending this mail to both the lists. Latent media
faults which prevent data from being read from portions of a disk has always
been a concern for us. Such faults will go undetected till
Nagpure, Dinesh wrote, on 2005-Feb-23 9:55 AM:
I can go back and put together a patch over the weekend if anyone is
interested in using it.
Yes, please, I'm very interested in using it.
Cheers,
11011011
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-raid in
the body of a
Peter T. Breuer wrote, on 2005-Feb-23 1:50 AM:
Quite possibly - I never tested the rewrite part of the patch, just
wrote it to indicate how it should go and stuck it in to encourage
others to go on from there. It's disabled by default. You almost
certainly don't want to enable it unless you are
: 'linux-raid@vger.kernel.org'
Subject: RAID1 robust read and read/write correct and EVMS-BBR
Hi,
I noticed the discussion about robust read on the RAID list and similar one
on the EVMS list so I am sending this mail to both the lists. Latent media
faults which prevent data from being read from portions
J. David Beutel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter T. Breuer wrote, on 2005-Feb-23 1:50 AM:
Quite possibly - I never tested the rewrite part of the patch, just
wrote it to indicate how it should go and stuck it in to encourage
others to go on from there. It's disabled by default. You almost
I can go back and put together a patch over the weekend if anyone is
interested in using it.
-dinesh
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Oh yes, please make this patch. We are very very interested in it!
We are waiting for the one day where the same block on all mirrors has
read problems. Ok, we're now
to the top level, but
didn't fault the disk because I'd trapped for that. That's how I
first learned I had to change the raid1_map function!
--- linux-2.4.24-uml/raid1.c.post-fr1-2.14b,post-read-balance,pre-robust-read
Tue Aug 31 20:22:49 2004
+++ linux-2.4.24-uml/raid1.cSun Jan 30 00:29:58
I've had the opportunity to test the robust read patch that I posted
earier in the month (10 Jan, Subject: Re: Spares and partitioning huge
disks), and it needs one more change ... I assumed that the raid1 map
function would move a (retried) request to another disk, but it des not,
it always moves
15 matches
Mail list logo
