Re: Still can't get md arrays that were started from an initrd to shutdown
with lvm you have to stop lvm before you can stop the arrays... i wouldn't be surprised if evms has the same issue... AFAIK there's no counterpart to evms_activate. Besides, I'm no longer using EVMS, I just included it in my testing since this issue bit me there first. Thanks, Christian - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: Still can't get md arrays that were started from an initrd to shutdown
Are you sure that there's nothing left running from your initrd that could be holding open, say, some block device that comprises part of your RAID array? No, I'm not sure. Both suitable ramdisk-creators in Debian (initramfs and yaird) supposedly delete everything in the ram disk before switching root, but that may not be enough. The yaird image I'm using is 1.5MB in size, if anyone wants to take a look at it. Its init script follows below. Thanks, C. #!/bin/dash # # Generator version: yaird 0.0.12-md_d # Kernel version: 2.6.17.4-99-em64t-p4-smp. # INIT_DEBUG= if [ "$INIT_DEBUG" != "" ] then set -x fi # # Utility functions # mksymdev () { devfile="$1" sysfile="$2" cb="$3" devpair=$(/bin/cat "$sysfile") for delay in 1 2 4 8 16 do if [ "$devpair" = "" ] then echo "Waiting $delay seconds for $sysfile to show up" sleep $delay fi devpair=$(/bin/cat "$sysfile") done if [ "$devpair" = "" ] then echo "Device $sysfile seems to be down." echo "Debugging opportunity, type ^D to continue." /bin/dash fi maj=${devpair%:*} min=${devpair#*:} /bin/mknod "$devfile" $cb $maj $min } mkcdev () { mksymdev "$1" "/sys/class/$2/dev" c } mkbdev () { mksymdev "$1" "/sys/block/$2/dev" b } switchroot () { if [ "$INIT_DEBUG" != "" ] then echo "Debugging opportunity, ^D to continue." /bin/dash fi echo "Switching root ..." /bin/umount -n /sys /bin/umount -n /proc exec /usr/lib/yaird/exec/run_init \ /mnt $init "$@" } # # Setting up mounts # /bin/mount -nt sysfs sysfs /sys /bin/mount -nt proc proc /proc # # We don't set up a separate /dev file system, # since rootfs is writable without problem. # # /dev/tty is needed for eg cryptsetup. mkcdev /dev/tty tty/tty # # Command line processing # init - first proc to start on next root # root - to be done: how should it relate # to file system selection? # ro,rw - mount root read-only or read-write. # This is like a mount -r; it overrules # a -o rw. # noresume, resume= - should we resume from a # suspend-to-disk? The resume parameter # is optional, but overrides automatic # detection of the resume partition if present. # noresume prevents us from attempting to resume. # ide - options for module ide_core. # need a way to append these to proper # module. do a check on module name # in insmod template? # ip=, nfsaddrs=, nfsroot= - support NFS boot # ro=-r ip= nfsroot= noresume= resume= resume2= init=/sbin/init for i in $(cat /proc/cmdline) do case "$i" in init=*) init=${i#init=} ;; ro) ro=-r ;; rw) ro= ;; ip=*|nfsaddrs=*) ip="$ip $i" ;; nfsroot=*) nfsroot="$i" ;; noresume) noresume=1 ;; resume=*) resume=${i#resume=} ;; resume2=*) resume2=${i#resume2=} ;; ydebug) INIT_DEBUG=yes esac done if [ "$INIT_DEBUG" != "" ] then set -x fi /sbin/insmod '/lib/modules/2.6.17.4-99-em64t-p4-smp/kernel/drivers/input/evdev.ko' /sbin/insmod '/lib/modules/2.6.17.4-99-em64t-p4-smp/kernel/drivers/scsi/scsi_mod.ko' /sbin/insmod '/lib/modules/2.6.17.4-99-em64t-p4-smp/kernel/drivers/scsi/libata.ko' /sbin/insmod '/lib/modules/2.6.17.4-99-em64t-p4-smp/kernel/drivers/scsi/ahci.ko' /sbin/insmod '/lib/modules/2.6.17.4-99-em64t-p4-smp/kernel/drivers/scsi/sd_mod.ko' mkbdev '/dev/sda' 'sda' mkbdev '/dev/sdb' 'sdb' /sbin/insmod '/lib/modules/2.6.17.4-99-em64t-p4-smp/kernel/drivers/md/md-mod.ko' /sbin/insmod '/lib/modules/2.6.17.4-99-em64t-p4-smp/kernel/drivers/md/raid1.ko' mknod /dev/md_d0 b 254 0 mdadm --assemble --config=partitions /dev/md_d0 --uuid 3f166256:cd9ff27e:a2c3596d:cc0b2092 dd if=/dev/md_d0 of=/dev/zero count=1 mkbdev '/dev/md_d0p1' 'md_d0/md_d0p1' /sbin/insmod '/lib/modules/2.6.17.4-99-em64t-p4-smp/kernel/fs/mbcache.ko' /sbin/insmod '/lib/modules/2.6.17.4-99-em64t-p4-smp/kernel/fs/jbd/jbd.ko' /sbin/insmod '/lib/modules/2.6.17.4-99-em64t-p4-smp/kernel/fs/ext3/ext3.ko' /bin/mount -n \ $ro \ -t ext3 \ -o 'errors=remount-ro' \ '/dev/md_d0p1' \ '/mnt' switchroot "$@" - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: Still can't get md arrays that were started from an initrd to shutdown
On Mon, 17 Jul 2006, Christian Pernegger wrote: > The problem seems to affect only arrays that are started via an > initrd, even if they do not have the root filesystem on them. > That's all arrays if they're either managed by EVMS or the > ramdisk-creator is initramfs-tools. For yaird-generated initrds only > the array with root on it is affected. with lvm you have to stop lvm before you can stop the arrays... i wouldn't be surprised if evms has the same issue... of course this *should* happen cleanly on shutdown assuming evms is also being shutdown... but maybe that gives you something to look for. -dean - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: Still can't get md arrays that were started from an initrd to shutdown
On 17 Jul 2006, Christian Pernegger suggested tentatively: > I'm still having problems with some md arrays not shutting down > cleanly on halt / reboot. > > The problem seems to affect only arrays that are started via an > initrd, even if they do not have the root filesystem on them. > That's all arrays if they're either managed by EVMS or the > ramdisk-creator is initramfs-tools. For yaird-generated initrds only > the array with root on it is affected. Hm. FWIW mine (started via initramfs) all shut down happily, so something more than this is involved. My initramfs has a /dev populated via busybox's `mdev -s', yielding a /dev containing all devices the kernel reports, under their kernel names. mdadm is run like this: /sbin/mdadm --assemble --scan --auto=md --run and, well, it works, with udev populating the appropriate devices for me once we switch to the real root filesystem. > If only there were an exitrd imge to comlement the initrds ... This shouldn't be necessary. One possible difference here is that switch_root (from recent busyboxes) deletes everything on the initramfs before chrooting to the new root. Are you sure that there's nothing left running from your initrd that could be holding open, say, some block device that comprises part of your RAID array? (I'm just guessing here, but this seems like the largest difference between your setup and mine.) -- `We're sysadmins. We deal with the inconceivable so often I can clearly see the need to define levels of inconceivability.' --- Rik Steenwinkel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Still can't get md arrays that were started from an initrd to shutdown
[This is a bit of a repost, because I'm slightly desperate :)] I'm still having problems with some md arrays not shutting down cleanly on halt / reboot. The problem seems to affect only arrays that are started via an initrd, even if they do not have the root filesystem on them. That's all arrays if they're either managed by EVMS or the ramdisk-creator is initramfs-tools. For yaird-generated initrds only the array with root on it is affected. At the moment I'm working around the problem by inserting a sync and 15 second sleep before reboot / halt. That way the array _sometimes_ is switched into a read-only mode. If only there were an exitrd imge to comlement the initrds ... Any ideas welcome Thank you, Christian - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html