Re: assemble vs create an array.......

2008-02-02 Thread Dragos
Hello, I am not sure if you have received my email from last week with the results of the different combinations prescribed (it contained html code). Anyway, I did a ro mount to check the partition and was happy to see a lot of files intact. A few seemed destroyed, but I am not sure. I tried a

Re: assemble vs create an array.......

2007-12-06 Thread Dragos
Thank you. I want to make sure I understand. 1- Does it matter which permutation of drives I use for xfs_repair (as long as it tells me that the Structure needs cleaning)? When it comes to linux I consider myself at intermediate level, but I am a beginner when it comes to raid and filesystem

Re: assemble vs create an array.......

2007-12-06 Thread Michael Tokarev
[Cc'd to xfs list as it contains something related] Dragos wrote: Thank you. I want to make sure I understand. [Some background for XFS list. The talk is about a broken linux software raid (the reason for breakage isn't relevant anymore). The OP seems to lost the order of drives in his

Re: assemble vs create an array.......

2007-12-06 Thread Eric Sandeen
Michael Tokarev wrote: It's sad that xfs refuses mount when structure needs cleaning - the best way here is to actually mount it and see how it looks like, instead of trying repair tools. Is there some option to force-mount it still (in readonly mode, knowing it may OOPs kernel etc)?

Re: assemble vs create an array.......

2007-12-06 Thread David Chinner
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 07:39:28PM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote: What to do is to give repairfs a try for each permutation, but again without letting it to actually fix anything. Just run it in read-only mode and see which combination of drives gives less errors, or no fatal errors (there may

Re: assemble vs create an array.......

2007-12-05 Thread David Greaves
Dragos wrote: Thank you for your very fast answers. First I tried 'fsck -n' on the existing array. The answer was that If I wanted to check a XFS partition I should use 'xfs_check'. That seems to say that my array was partitioned with xfs, not reiserfs. Am I correct? Then I tried the

Re: assemble vs create an array.......

2007-12-04 Thread Dragos
Thank you for your very fast answers. First I tried 'fsck -n' on the existing array. The answer was that If I wanted to check a XFS partition I should use 'xfs_check'. That seems to say that my array was partitioned with xfs, not reiserfs. Am I correct? Then I tried the different

Re: assemble vs create an array.......

2007-11-30 Thread Bryce
Dragos wrote: Hello, I had created a raid 5 array on 3 232GB SATA drives. I had created one partition (for /home) formatted with either xfs or reiserfs (I do not recall). Last week I reinstalled my box from scratch with Ubuntu 7.10, with mdadm v. 2.6.2-1ubuntu2. Then I made a rookie mistake:

Re: assemble vs create an array.......

2007-11-30 Thread David Greaves
Neil Brown wrote: On Thursday November 29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2. Do you know of any way to recover from this mistake? Or at least what filesystem it was formated with. It may not have been lost - yet. If you created the same array with the same devices and layout etc, the data will

Re: assemble vs create an array.......

2007-11-30 Thread Dragos
I forgot one thing. After re-creating the array which deleted my data in the first place, 'mount' was giving me this answer: mount: Structure needs cleaning Thank you for your time, Dragos - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-raid in the body of a message to

assemble vs create an array.......

2007-11-29 Thread Dragos
Hello, I had created a raid 5 array on 3 232GB SATA drives. I had created one partition (for /home) formatted with either xfs or reiserfs (I do not recall). Last week I reinstalled my box from scratch with Ubuntu 7.10, with mdadm v. 2.6.2-1ubuntu2. Then I made a rookie mistake: I --create

Re: assemble vs create an array.......

2007-11-29 Thread Neil Brown
On Thursday November 29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I had created a raid 5 array on 3 232GB SATA drives. I had created one partition (for /home) formatted with either xfs or reiserfs (I do not recall). Last week I reinstalled my box from scratch with Ubuntu 7.10, with mdadm v.