On 7/19/06, Sevrin Robstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried file -s /dev/md0 also, and with one of the disk as first disk I
got ext 3 filedata (needs journal recovery) (errors) .
Congratulations, you have found your first disk. Does fsck still
complain about the magic number?
-
To unsubscribe
What are you expecting fdisk to tell you? fdisk lists partitions and
I suspect you didn't have any partitions on /dev/md0
More likely you want something like
fsck -n -f /dev/md0
and see which one produces the least noise.
Maybe a simple file -s /dev/md0 could do the trick, and would only
Francois Barre wrote:
What are you expecting fdisk to tell you? fdisk lists partitions and
I suspect you didn't have any partitions on /dev/md0
More likely you want something like
fsck -n -f /dev/md0
and see which one produces the least noise.
Maybe a simple file -s /dev/md0 could do the
More likely to produce an output whenever the 1st disk in the array is in the
right place as it will
just look at the 1st couple of sectors for the superblock.
I'd go with the fsck idea as it will try to inspect the rest of the filesystem
also.
Obviously that's true, but it's still a good
Sevrin Robstad wrote:
I created the RAID when I installed Fedora Core 3 some time ago,
didn't do anything special so the chunks should be 64kbyte and
parity should be left-symmetric ?
I have no idea what's default on FC3, sorry.
Any Idea ?
I missed that you were trying to fdisk -l
Neil Brown wrote:
I have written some posts about this before... My 6 disk RAID 5 broke
down because of hardware failure. When I tried to get it up'n'running
again
I did a --create without any missing disk, which made it rebuild. I have
also lost all information about how the old RAID was set
Sevrin Robstad wrote:
I got a friend of mine to make a list of all the 6^6 combinations of dev
1 2 3 4 5 missing,
shouldn't this work ???
Only if you get the layout and chunk size right.
And make sure that you know whether you were using partitions (eg.
sda1) or whole drives (eg. sda - bad
Molle Bestefich wrote:
Sevrin Robstad wrote:
I got a friend of mine to make a list of all the 6^6 combinations of
dev
1 2 3 4 5 missing,
shouldn't this work ???
Only if you get the layout and chunk size right.
And make sure that you know whether you were using partitions (eg.
sda1) or
On Monday July 17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have written some posts about this before... My 6 disk RAID 5 broke
down because of hardware failure. When I tried to get it up'n'running again
I did a --create without any missing disk, which made it rebuild. I have
also lost all information
I have written some posts about this before... My 6 disk RAID 5 broke
down because of hardware failure. When I tried to get it up'n'running again
I did a --create without any missing disk, which made it rebuild. I have
also lost all information about how the old RAID was set up..
I got a
10 matches
Mail list logo
