On Sun, 28 May 2000, David Francis wrote:
Hello,
I have just set up a new web server with two drives each configured with
four identical partitions. The three "non-swap" partitions are all set up
as RAID level 1 mirrors. Everything is up and running fine.
md0 = /
md1 = /home
md2 =
I'm running S/W raid-1 with 2 18G seagate barracuda on a Initio
1060P U2W SCSI Controller and a CT 69000 VGA controller for
AGP interface on Linux RH 6.2.
Initially this works fine, untill I start using S/W raid-1.
My XFont-server fails immediately.
If I already have XFree86-3.3.6-20 running
On Mon, 29 May 2000, James Manning wrote:
Sure makes it look like hdc3 has some major issues. It has a partition
type of fd, but invalid raid superblock. Makes me wonder if e2fsck
didn't get run on hdc3 itself and it "fixed" that last part (hope not
since it may have done some real
Thanks a *LOT* guys, it works and i now have all my lovely data back :)
On Mon, 29 May 2000, Mike Black wrote:
Not if you haven't changed the RAID config from your initial setup. (i.e.
havent' removed/added any drives).
I've done this a couple of times with no problem.
If you change the
Sorry to but in on this one
So, if both drives in a RAID1 config are in sync running mkraid --force
will not destroy the content ?.
Does anyone know if this would sort out a problem that I am having whereby
LILO only updates one of the two drives in a RAID1 config ?. I suspect
that I have
I am running Redhat 6.0 with kernel 2.2.5-22. I have successfully created a
RAID1 disk and mount with no problem. However, when I reboot the machine,
it failed. Below is part of the message from running command dmesg:
autorun ...
... autorun DONE.
VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem).
(scsi0)
I started seeing this when I blew away my RAID0 arrays and put RAID1 arrays
on my home machine. I suspect that this is cause by RedHat putting
something in the initscripts to start the RAID arrays AND the RAID slices
being set to type fd (RAID autodetect), but I haven't been able to confirm
Hi there,
I'm wondering if anyone has run
into a distribution of linux that has software raid-util's pre-packaged into it,
or available in a third party package. I'v been trying to setup software raid
with three 2.1G SCSIdrives for quite a while now and am simply looking for
an easier
Try RedHat 6.2 or 6.1. I've installed both onto a computer with dual 2GB
SCSI drives in a RAID1. I wouldn't use anything else for /boot (assuming
that's where you keep everything boot-related). I never use a RAM disk for
essential things like SCSI drivers and RAID code, so that's not an issue
I'm reasonably sure Redhat 6.2 is ready to go out of the box.
BTW, please don't send html mail to the list.
cheers,
Chris
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 29 14:14:34 2000
Hi there,
I'm wondering if anyone has run into a distribution of linux that =
has software raid-util's
[Slip]
I'm wondering if anyone has run into a distribution of linux that
has software raid-util's pre-packaged into it, or available in a third
party package. I'v been trying to setup software raid with three 2.1G
SCSI drives for quite a while now and am simply looking for an
[Jieming Wang]
autorun ...
considering sdb1 ...
adding sdb1 ...
adding sda1 ...
created md0
bindsda1,1
bindsdb1,2
running: sdb1sda1
now!
sdb1's event counter: 000a
sda1's event counter: 000a
Looks like a couple of partitions with type fd, looking great for
autostart by the
Hallo!
I have some problems with my RAID5-system. The setup worked fine,
everything is running. But if I copy files to my RAID-drive, the files are
corrupt - that means, if I have copied a zipped file to my disks and want
to unzip it, I get some CRC-errors. I compared the file on the
[Gregory Leblanc]
I started seeing this when I blew away my RAID0 arrays and put RAID1 arrays
on my home machine. I suspect that this is cause by RedHat putting
something in the initscripts to start the RAID arrays AND the RAID slices
being set to type fd (RAID autodetect), but I haven't
14 matches
Mail list logo
