subsribe
--
Kai Wilke
Patch http://www.icon.fi/~mak/raid1/raid1readbalance-2.2.15-B2
improves read performance right? At what cost?
Can/Should I apply the raid1readbalance-2.2.15-B2 patch after
applying mingo's raid-2.2.16-A0 patch?
What version of raidtools should I use against a stock 2.2.16
system with
Hi,
2 disks with RH 5.2, kernel 2.2.14 + RAID-patch: root and swap are
regular partitions, while /tmp, /var and /usr are mirrored. Yesterday
I installed a new bootdisk (the other one had medium errors in the
root-partition) and of course the new disk has a different
geometry. Anyway, I managed
Hello All,
Im running 6.2 RH (2.2.14 smp ) on Intel SMP and non SMP machines
with PII and PIII
Ive written a small kernel module which executes the following
operations in the tq_scheduler bottom halves. I suppose they are safe
enough. But if Im wrong please correct me. Here is
Hi,
This may have been asked to death by now, but I did
not see an answer in the archive: is it possible to have
/ on RAID0 with 2.3.99 kernel (lets say -pre9)?
I have a RH6.2 with 2.2.14 (pre-patched for RAID
courtesy of RedHat) so it has / on a raid0 drive (I'm short
on disk space to do raid1
Hello
I want to use an informix database with an 2.4.test Kernel. I want to
set up a software RAID and RAW-devices for the database. Now, my
question? Does this configuration stable works Have anybody some
experiences about this???
--
Mfg. Thomas King
-Original Message-
From: Hugh Bragg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2000 5:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Benchmarks, raid1 (was raid0) performance
Patch http://www.icon.fi/~mak/raid1/raid1readbalance-2.2.15-B2
improves read performance right? At
: Can/Should I apply the raid1readbalance-2.2.15-B2 patch after
: applying mingo's raid-2.2.16-A0 patch?
:
: I don't see any reason not to apply it, although I haven't
: tried it with 2.2.16.
I have been out of the linux-raid world for a bit, but a
two-drive RAID1 installation yesterday has
-Original Message-
From: Diegmueller, Jason (I.T. Dept) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2000 10:46 AM
To: 'Gregory Leblanc'; 'Hugh Bragg'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Benchmarks, raid1 (was raid0) performance
: Can/Should I apply the
: None offhand, but can you post your test configuration/parameters?
: Things like test size, relavent portions of /etc/raidtab, things
: like that. I know this should be a whole big list, but I can think
: of all of them right now. FYI, I don't do IDE RAID (or IDE at all),
: but it's pretty
On Wed Jun 21 2000 at 12:46:02 -0500, Diegmueller, Jason (I.T. Dept) wrote:
: Can/Should I apply the raid1readbalance-2.2.15-B2 patch after
: applying mingo's raid-2.2.16-A0 patch?
:
: I don't see any reason not to apply it, although I haven't
: tried it with 2.2.16.
I have been out
: Look at the Bonnies seek performance. It should rise.
: For single sequential reads, readbalancer doesn't help.
: Bonnie tests only single sequential reads.
:
: If you wan't to test with multiple io threads, try
: http://tiobench.sourceforge.net
Great, thanks, I'll give this a try!
Hi all,
I've been using raid5 with auto-detection for over a year without
problems. Everything including the root fs is on raid5, the machine
boots from floppy.
I now want to rearrange the disks in raid0 arrays, and make a raid5 of
these. Will auto-detection/autostart work in this case? It
-Original Message-
From: Carlos Carvalho [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2000 2:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: autostart with raid5 over raid0?
Hi all,
I've been using raid5 with auto-detection for over a year without
problems. Everything including
14 matches
Mail list logo
