it puts a much
greater load on the server than if you access it with a plain
old ftp client.
RGDS
GARY
---
Gary E. Miller Rellim 20340 Empire Ave, Suite E-3, Bend, OR 97701
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel:+1(541)382-8588 Fax: +1(541
the 2.4.0test* kernels. They
work fine for a while on my Dual PIII and then lock up hard. under
load. Not all hardware seems affected but I have not tracked it down.
RGDS
GARY
---
Gary E. Miller Rellim 20340 Empire Ave, Suite E-3
e task_struct. So I changed current-priority to
current-nice is 4 places and it compiled OK. Dunno if this
was the right thing to do but fingers are crossed.
RGDS
GARY
-------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 20340 Empire Ave, Suite
RGDS
GARY
-------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 20340 Empire Ave, Suite E-3, Bend, OR 97701
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel:+1(541)382-8588 Fax: +1(541)382-8676
that was supported was the Ultra66 from
Promise.
---
Gary E. Miller Rellim 20340 Empire Ave, Suite E-3, Bend, OR 97701
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel:+1(541)382-8588 Fax: +1(541)382-8676
bios rev (promise)?
On Fri, 5 May 2000, Gary E. Miller wrote:
Yo Andre!
2.2.14 did not work for me. I have a dual PIII with onboard UDMA33
controller running RAID1. Very stable. When I just moved the
two drives to a Promise Ultra66 the system became very unstable
(uptimes
rmania.com
-------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 20340 Empire Ave, Suite E-3, Bend, OR 97701
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel:+1(541)382-8588 Fax: +1(541)382-8676
:
Forgive my ignorance on the subject but what difference
would parity ram have made? Parity RAM forces you to buy ram
in identical sets of 2 right? While I'm asking ecc has built in error
checking, right?
"Gary E. Miller" wrote:
Yo Vinny!
And of course this time you will rememb
this makes the
canonical kernel soon.
Guess I have to stop procrastinateing and go back to my 1040...
RGDS
GARY
---
Gary E. Miller Rellim 20340 Empire Ave, Suite E-3, Bend, OR 97701
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel:+1(541)382
