Re: adaptec 2940U2W/ibm ultrastar 9ES problem

No, I am sorry. Never seen this. What about termination and the other things? I think you should send your question also to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (if you haven't done yet); those guys are writing scsi drivers and have much more experiences (of course). Greetings, Dietmar Charles Galpin wrote:

Raid-1

Will Linux allow level 1 raid to be two partitions on the same disk? I know this is not something any sane person would do, but for the dake of exper-menting I would like to know. I attempted it, but I get mkraid: aborted after trying it. Don't know if my config is wrong. Greg Michie

Help with RAID1 configuration...

Hello Everyone, I was wondering if someone could help me trouble shoot the following problems I am currently having in creating a RAID1 array. First, I've configured, compiled and correctly installed linux-2.2.12 with the raid014519990824 patch. In addition, I am also using raidtools 0.90

Autodetection of Raid Array

2 bindhdd1,3 running: hdd1hdc1hdb1 now! hdd1's event counter: 0004 hdc1's event counter: 0004 hdb1's event counter: 0004 request_module[md-personality-4]: Root fs not mounted do_md_run() returned -22 unbindhdd1,2 export_rdev(hdd1) unbindhdc1,1 export_rdev(hdc1) unbindhdb1,0 export_rdev(hdb1) md0

mkraid

I get the following message after doing mkraid /dev/md0 handling MD device /dev/md0 analyzing super-block disk 0: /dev/sda1, 24066kB, raid superblock at 24000kB /dev/sda1 is mounted mkraid: aborted, see the syslog and /proc/mdstat for potential clues. I am a little confused about how to set up

Raid with Kernel 2.3.x

Hello everybody, due to the fact that I'm new in the group, let me put a propably silly question: - Will raidtools 0.90 work any longer with Kernel 2.3.x? - Are there propably some whitepapers of the authors somewhere? Thank you for your answers. Best regards Wolfgang Magin

Re: loose cables on external raid device

Eric Enockson wrote: hello, I have an external raid scsi device with a loose cable. It would come loose and things would freeze up on the machine, and then i would push it back in and the system would come back. Now however i get somewhat random operating system crashes. At

Raid-1 Problem

Hi! I compiled kernel 2.2.14 with raid support: --- secu kernel: md driver 0.36.6 MAX_MD_DEV=4, MAX_REAL=8 secu kernel: linear personality registered secu kernel: raid0 personality registered secu kernel: raid1 personality registered secu kernel: raid5 personality registered ---

Problems with IDE RAID5

Having some problems setting up IDE RAID5 on Kernel 2.2.14 Kernel: 2.2.14 Patches: ide_2_2_14_2124_patch.gz raid-2_2.14-B1 (Encountered Hunk problems, but I've heard this is normal) Tools: raidtools-19990824-0_90_tar.gz I have three Segate 6GB ATA66 Harddrives, two of which are hanging

Re: superblock or the partition table is corrupt?

h. Looks like I forgot this step. I have a raid 1 setup under RedHat 6.1's stock 2.2.12 kernel with raidtools already installed. It works fine, a disk failed last weekend and I was able to recover that disk while the array continued to function. My question is this: Is it too late to run

Re: superblock or the partition table is corrupt?

Thanks, so I should be able to do the following without loss to date right? 1. umount /dev/md0 2. raidstop /dev/md0 3. change partition types on /dev/sda5 and /dev/sdb5 to fd (was linux) 4. raidstart /dev/md0 5 mount -t ext2 /dev/md0 /mirrored_databases My /etc/raidtab: # persistent

PLEASE HELP: mkraid aborts!

I am trying to make a software raid5, and it seems no matter what I do mkraid aborts. My mkraid output looks like this: handling MD device /dev/md0 analyzing super-block disk 0: /dev/hde2, 5269320kB, raid superblock at 5269248kB disk 1: /dev/hdf2, 5269320kB, raid superblock at 5269248kB disk 2:

Re: Danger! Virus Alert! Re: ILOVEYOU

Hi Seth Nope, reading this with vi under Linux will not hurt you. This piece of DooDoo requires the Windows scripting host to execute. Without Windows it is just harmless text. H I wonder if the fact that this virus needs windows makes windows itself a virus or at least part of one - the

Raid1: How to verify that mirroring is functioning

Hi, I've created mirrored striped arrays (Raid10) and am not confident that my first striped set is in fact being mirrored on my second striped set. When the mirrored mdX devices are created, cat /proc/mdstat does show that re-synching is taking place. However, if I mount an mdX that is part

raid quickstart guide

I just wanted to thank you for putting together a *great* quick guide. I'm working on stuff like this myself for our user group we've just gotten started and I want to tell you what a time saver you have been. thank you thank you thank you "dude" :) Bill Blair L.U.C.K.Y Linux Users of Central