Re: RAID5 drive failure, please verify my commands

2005-01-16 Thread Robin Bowes
Gerd Knops wrote: Hello all, One of the dreaded Maxtor SATA drives in my RAID5 failed, after just 3 months of light use. Anyhow I neither have the disk capacity nor the money to buy it to make a backup. To make sure I do it correctly, could you folks please double-check my intended course of

Re: RAID5 drive failure, please verify my commands

2005-01-17 Thread Robin Bowes
Mike Hardy wrote: Gerd Knops wrote: Hello all, One of the dreaded Maxtor SATA drives in my RAID5 failed, after just 3 months of light use. Anyhow I neither have the disk capacity nor the money to buy it to make a backup. To make sure I do it correctly, could you folks please double-check my

Re: migrating raid-1 to different drive geometry ?

2005-01-24 Thread Robin Bowes
Neil Brown wrote: If you are using a recent 2.6 kernel and mdadm 1.8.0, you can grow the array with mdadm --grow /dev/mdX --size=max Neil, Is this just for RAID1? OR will it work for RAID5 too? R. -- http://robinbowes.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-raid in

Re: Broken harddisk

2005-02-01 Thread Robin Bowes
Luca Berra wrote: On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 03:02:54PM +, Robin Bowes wrote: True enough. However, until SMART support makes it into linux SATA drivers I'm pretty much stuck with dd! http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/jgarzik/libata/ I avoid patching kernels, preferring to use

Joys of spare disks!

2005-02-28 Thread Robin Bowes
Hi, I run a RAID5 array built from six 250GB Maxtor Maxline II SATA disks. After having several problems with Maxtor disks I decided to use a spare disk, i.e. 5+1 spare. Well, *another* disk failed last week. The spare disk was brought into play seamlessly: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# mdadm

Re: non-optimal RAID 5 performance with 8 drive array

2005-03-01 Thread Robin Bowes
Nicola Fankhauser wrote: see [3] for a description of what I did and more details. Hi Nicola, I read your description with interest. I thought I'd try some speed tests myself but dd doesn't seem to work the same for me (on FC3). Here's what I get: [EMAIL PROTECTED] test]# dd if=/dev/zero

Re: new array not starting

2006-11-07 Thread Robin Bowes
Robin Bowes wrote: If I try to start the array manually: # mdadm --assemble --auto=yes /dev/md2 /dev/hdc /dev/hdd /dev/hde /dev/hdf /dev/hdg /dev/hdh /dev/hdi /dev/hdj mdadm: cannot open device /dev/hdc: No such file or directory mdadm: /dev/hdc has no superblock - assembly aborted

Re: new array not starting

2006-11-07 Thread Robin Bowes
Robin Bowes wrote: This worked: # mdadm --assemble --auto=yes /dev/md2 /dev/sdc /dev/sdd /dev/sde /dev/sdf /dev/sdg /dev/sdh /dev/sdi /dev/sdj mdadm: /dev/md2 has been started with 8 drives. However, I'm not sure why it didn't start automatically at boot. Do I need to put it in /etc

Re: new array not starting

2006-11-07 Thread Robin Bowes
Robin Bowes wrote: Robin Bowes wrote: This worked: # mdadm --assemble --auto=yes /dev/md2 /dev/sdc /dev/sdd /dev/sde /dev/sdf /dev/sdg /dev/sdh /dev/sdi /dev/sdj mdadm: /dev/md2 has been started with 8 drives. However, I'm not sure why it didn't start automatically at boot. Do I need

Re: new array not starting

2006-11-08 Thread Robin Bowes
Robin Bowes wrote: Well, at the risk of having a complete conversation with myself, I've created partitions of type fd on each disk and re-created the array out of the partitions instead of the whole disk. mdadm --create /dev/md2 --auto=yes --raid-devices=8 --level=6 /dev/sdc1 /dev/sdd1

Re: raid5 software vs hardware: parity calculations?

2007-01-13 Thread Robin Bowes
Bill Davidsen wrote: There have been several recent threads on the list regarding software RAID-5 performance. The reference might be updated to reflect the poor write performance of RAID-5 until/unless significant tuning is done. Read that as tuning obscure parameters and throwing a lot of

Re: raid5 software vs hardware: parity calculations?

2007-01-15 Thread Robin Bowes
Bill Davidsen wrote: Robin Bowes wrote: Bill Davidsen wrote: There have been several recent threads on the list regarding software RAID-5 performance. The reference might be updated to reflect the poor write performance of RAID-5 until/unless significant tuning is done. Read