SOFTRAID

I'm using Suse Linux 6.4. I want to install a raid1 on /dev/hda4 and /dev/hdb2. The /etc/raidtab is OK. Now I want to excecute mkraid /dev/md0 The answer is: Handling MD Device /dev/md0 analyzing super-block disk0: .. disk1: .. Mkraid aborted, the the syslog or /proc/mdstat for

Re: SOFTRAID

Mkraid aborted, the the syslog or /proc/mdstat for potential clues. I had this promlem because of unpatched kernel.

LILO for RAID1

Hello all, what is the correct root/boot LILO config option for RAID1? (root fs on raid) Seems boot=/dev/md0 and root=/dev/md0 OK, but LILO can't boot only when I issue manually the 'kernel root=/dev/md0'

Re: LILO for RAID1

what is the correct root/boot LILO config option for RAID1? (root fs on raid) Seems boot=/dev/md0 and root=/dev/md0 OK, but LILO can't boot only when I issue manually the 'kernel root=/dev/md0' Hi, try linear # cat /etc/lilo.conf [...] linear [...] Octave Amicalement, oCtAvE "Internet

Re: LILO for RAID1

set boot to a real bootable device (like /dev/sda) and root to the md device. -ilia "Gabor Z. Papp" wrote: Hello all, what is the correct root/boot LILO config option for RAID1? (root fs on raid) Seems boot=/dev/md0 and root=/dev/md0 OK, but LILO can't boot only when I issue manually the 'kernel

raid-0.90 and 2.2.16

Hello, Does anyone have a patch that will patch properly for 2.2.16? I've looked on kernel.org/pub/linux/daemons/raid/alpha but found only 2.2.12 patches and nothing later. Thank you. -reid

Re: raid-0.90 and 2.2.16

I used Ingo's patch from http://people.redhat.com/mingo/raid-patches/raid-2.2.16-A0 and it built without issue. There is also a 2.2.17 patch that applies cleanly against the Alan Cox's 2.2.17pre13 code for me. -Nic Benders On Wed, 26 Jul 2000, Reid Sutherland wrote: Does anyone have

raid and 2.4 kernels

do the kernel developers responsible for RAID read this list? I would be interested in seeing some constructive discussion about the reports of degraded RAID performance in the 2.4 kernels. It is particularly disappointing given that SMP appears to be a lot better in 2.4 vs 2.2 -- ai

OT: Kernel Management

Title: OT: Kernel Management I've been wanting to mess around with the latest 2.4 kernels and RAID, but one thing that I just don't understand/know about the whole compiling the kernel is this: How do you manage the System.map file that resides in /boot on RedHat systems? I have no problems

Re: OT: Kernel Management

I am sure each individual has their own style for rolling kernels, but on redhat systems my preference is after running "make config", edit the Makefile. I tweekt the "EXTRAVERSION" variable towards the top so I can have multiple kernels/module versions of the same revision (ex 2.2.16-1

Download FREE Software Promote Your Business!

InterNETACTIVE has sold for $39.95 and more... InterNETACTIVE allows you to post your ad on Classified Sites and Internet Malls for free! InterNETACTIVE reveals what REALLY works to get you top ranking among the most popular search engines. InterNETACTIVE is yours FREE with no strings

Re: raid and 2.4 kernels

On Wed, 26 Jul 2000, Anton wrote: do the kernel developers responsible for RAID read this list? I would be interested in seeing some constructive discussion about the reports of degraded RAID performance in the 2.4 kernels. It is particularly disappointing given that SMP appears to be a

Re: OT: Kernel Management

On Wed, 26 Jul 2000, Bryan Batchelder wrote: I've been wanting to mess around with the latest 2.4 kernels and RAID, but one thing that I just don't understand/know about the whole compiling the kernel is this: How do you manage the System.map file that resides in /boot on RedHat systems?

Raid developers question

Dear Raiders, I installed a 2.2.16 kernel over my Suse 6.3 (2.2.13) and patched them with raid-2.2.16-A0.txt. Installation of the raidtools-19990824-0.90.tar.gz , which is by the way the same as raidtools-dangerous-0.90-2116.tar.gz (I checked, but maybe not good enough), was a piece of cake.

Re: LILO for RAID1

Take a look at http://metalab.unc.edu/mdw/HOWTO/Software-RAID-HOWTO-4.html#ss4.11 There is a patched version of LILO wich accept boot=/dev/md0 in lilo.conf and will make each disk in the mirror bootable. Ilia Baldine a écrit : set boot to a real bootable device (like /dev/sda) and root to the

Re: raid and 2.4 kernels

On Wednesday July 26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: do the kernel developers responsible for RAID read this list? I would be interested in seeing some constructive discussion about the reports of degraded RAID performance in the 2.4 kernels. It is particularly disappointing given that SMP

RE: raid and 2.4 kernels

-Original Message- From: Neil Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2000 7:41 PM To: Anton Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: raid and 2.4 kernels On Wednesday July 26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: do the kernel developers responsible for RAID read this list?

Detaching mirrors with raidtools 0.9

G'day Folks, My apologies if this is RTFM or previously discussed on list (I have just joined). We have implemenetd mirroring using raidtools 0.9 on RedHat 6.2. It is working well, but we would like the ability to do the following to backup a Lotus Domino server: 1. Shutdown Domino server 2.