On Thu, Aug 10, 2000 at 05:07:42PM +0200, Karl-Heinz Herrmann wrote:
Hi,
On 10-Aug-00 Christoph Kukulies wrote:
If the patch is not clean (i.e. rejects) you probably had a kernel
patched
with the old style md-raid. The patch is probably against a clean kernel
source.
Indeed, I
On 11-Aug-00 Christoph Kukulies wrote:
# cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [1 linear] [2 raid0] [3 raid1] [4 raid5]
read_ahead not set
md0 : inactive
md1 : inactive
md2 : inactive
md3 : inactive
Yes -- thats old style md-raid.
So you have a kernel which is already patched with raid-code
On Fri, Aug 11, 2000 at 10:53:11AM +0200, Karl-Heinz Herrmann wrote:
On 11-Aug-00 Christoph Kukulies wrote:
# cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [1 linear] [2 raid0] [3 raid1] [4 raid5]
read_ahead not set
md0 : inactive
md1 : inactive
md2 : inactive
md3 : inactive
Yes -- thats
On 11-Aug-00 Christoph Kukulies wrote:
So you have a kernel which is already patched with raid-code and you try
to
patched with old style raid code?
Yes -- thats the problem.
SuSE is just the same -- They distribute kernels which include a lot of
patches and you almost can't apply a new
Christoph Kukulies writes:
...
Would there be a patch against an oldstyle md-patched kernel somewhere?
Since your distribution (Wasn't it RedHat?) is delivering it like that
Yes, RH 6.1
maybe they should do that?
But your best strategy is probably to grab a clean kernel
