On 6/3/2014 9:16 AM, Roland Dreier wrote:
On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Sagi Grimberg sa...@mellanox.com wrote:
Although these patches involve 3 subsystems with different
maintainers (scsi, iser, target) I would prefer seeing these
patches included together.
Why? Because they break wire
On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Sagi Grimberg sa...@mellanox.com wrote:
Although these patches involve 3 subsystems with different
maintainers (scsi, iser, target) I would prefer seeing these
patches included together.
Why? Because they break wire compatibility?
I hate to say it but even if
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 9:16 AM, Roland Dreier rol...@purestorage.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Sagi Grimberg sa...@mellanox.com wrote:
Although these patches involve 3 subsystems with different
maintainers (scsi, iser, target) I would prefer seeing these
patches included together.
At the SCSI transport level, there is no distinction between
user data and protection information. Thus, iscsi header field
expected data transfer length should include protection
information.
This set modifies both the iscsi initiator (patch #1), and
target (patch #2) to expect data length which
