On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi Matan,
>
> IB_CQ_FLAGS_TIMESTAMP_COMPLETION is _only_ used in the uverbs interface.
>
Currently this is used only for uverbs interface. The reason for that
is that we've only pushed completion timestamping for user-space
support.
How
Hi Matan,
IB_CQ_FLAGS_TIMESTAMP_COMPLETION is _only_ used in the uverbs interface.
But other than that userspace ABIs really must go to the UAPI headers,
otherwise they will be broken sooner or later. RDMA is an unfortunate
oddball under the kernel subsystems that's been ignoring the rule for
no
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> +enum {
>> + CQ_CREATE_FLAGS_SUPPORTED = IB_CQ_FLAGS_TIMESTAMP_COMPLETION
>> +};
>
>
> How does userspace know the value of IB_CQ_FLAGS_TIMESTAMP_COMPLETION?
>
> It's not defined in any UAPI header.
Currently, a lot of flags are def
> +enum {
> + CQ_CREATE_FLAGS_SUPPORTED = IB_CQ_FLAGS_TIMESTAMP_COMPLETION
> +};
How does userspace know the value of IB_CQ_FLAGS_TIMESTAMP_COMPLETION?
It's not defined in any UAPI header.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to ma
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 1:24 AM, Jason Gunthorpe
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 06:30:54PM +0200, Matan Barak wrote:
>> @@ -1385,7 +1385,8 @@ static void *mlx5_ib_add(struct mlx5_core_dev *mdev)
>> (1ull << IB_USER_VERBS_CMD_CREATE_XSRQ) |
>> (1ull << IB_USER_
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 1:22 AM, Jason Gunthorpe
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 06:30:54PM +0200, Matan Barak wrote:
>> In order to create a CQ that supports timestamp, mlx5 needs to
>> support the extended create CQ command with the timestamp flag.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Matan Barak
>> drivers/
On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 06:30:54PM +0200, Matan Barak wrote:
> @@ -1385,7 +1385,8 @@ static void *mlx5_ib_add(struct mlx5_core_dev *mdev)
> (1ull << IB_USER_VERBS_CMD_CREATE_XSRQ) |
> (1ull << IB_USER_VERBS_CMD_OPEN_QP);
> dev->ib_dev.uverbs_ex_cmd_mask =
>
On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 06:30:54PM +0200, Matan Barak wrote:
> In order to create a CQ that supports timestamp, mlx5 needs to
> support the extended create CQ command with the timestamp flag.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matan Barak
> drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/cq.c | 7 +++
> drivers/infiniband/hw/
On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 06:30:54PM +0200, Matan Barak wrote:
> In order to create a CQ that supports timestamp, mlx5 needs to
> support the extended create CQ command with the timestamp flag.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matan Barak
Acked-by: Eli Cohen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "uns
On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 06:30:54PM +0200, Matan Barak wrote:
> In order to create a CQ that supports timestamp, mlx5 needs to
> support the extended create CQ command with the timestamp flag.
>
i> Signed-off-by: Matan Barak
Acked-by: Eli Cohen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "un
In order to create a CQ that supports timestamp, mlx5 needs to
support the extended create CQ command with the timestamp flag.
Signed-off-by: Matan Barak
---
drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/cq.c | 7 +++
drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
11 matches
Mail list logo