On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 23:22:46 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 13:05 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> > From: "Steve Wise"
> > Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 11:11:49 -0600
> >
> > >>
> > >> > -static int allow_db_fc_on_t5;
> > >> > -module_param(allow_db_fc_on_t5, int, 0644);
> > >> >
On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 13:05 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Steve Wise"
> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 11:11:49 -0600
>
> >>
> >> > -static int allow_db_fc_on_t5;
> >> > -module_param(allow_db_fc_on_t5, int, 0644);
> >> > -MODULE_PARM_DESC(allow_db_fc_on_t5,
> >> > - "Allow DB Flow Contr
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 13:05:44 -0500 (EST)
David Miller wrote:
> From: "Steve Wise"
> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 11:11:49 -0600
>
> >>
> >> > -static int allow_db_fc_on_t5;
> >> > -module_param(allow_db_fc_on_t5, int, 0644);
> >> > -MODULE_PARM_DESC(allow_db_fc_on_t5,
> >> > - "Allow
From: "Steve Wise"
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 11:11:49 -0600
>>
>> > -static int allow_db_fc_on_t5;
>> > -module_param(allow_db_fc_on_t5, int, 0644);
>> > -MODULE_PARM_DESC(allow_db_fc_on_t5,
>> > - "Allow DB Flow Control on T5 (default = 0)");
>> > -
>> > -static int allow_db_coalescing_o
>
> > -static int allow_db_fc_on_t5;
> > -module_param(allow_db_fc_on_t5, int, 0644);
> > -MODULE_PARM_DESC(allow_db_fc_on_t5,
> > -"Allow DB Flow Control on T5 (default = 0)");
> > -
> > -static int allow_db_coalescing_on_t5;
> > -module_param(allow_db_coalescing_on_t5, int, 0644);
>
From: Hariprasad Shenai
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 20:36:49 +0530
> -static int allow_db_fc_on_t5;
> -module_param(allow_db_fc_on_t5, int, 0644);
> -MODULE_PARM_DESC(allow_db_fc_on_t5,
> - "Allow DB Flow Control on T5 (default = 0)");
> -
> -static int allow_db_coalescing_on_t5;
> -modul
From: Steve Wise
The current logic suffers from a slow response time to disable user DB
usage, and also fails to avoid DB FIFO drops under heavy load. This commit
fixes these deficiencies and makes the avoidance logic more optimal.
This is done by more efficiently notifying the ULDs of potential
