Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] Introduce Signature feature

2013-12-15 Thread Or Gerlitz
On 11/12/2013 19:26, Or Gerlitz wrote: Hi Roland, these patches are in the air for two months (V0 posted Oct 15th http://marc.info/?l=linux-rdma&m=138185152212490&w=2) and not a word from you. Sagi will be posting V4 soon with the latest cut of the code, rebased to 3.13-rc and containing som

Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] Introduce Signature feature

2013-12-11 Thread Or Gerlitz
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:11 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote: > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Hefty, Sean wrote: >>> To begin with T10 DIF **is** industry standard, which is to be used in >>> production storage systems, the feature here is T10 DIF acceleration for >>> upstream kernel storage drivers suc

Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] Introduce Signature feature

2013-11-14 Thread Tzahi Oved
On 14/11/2013 02:19, Hefty, Sean wrote: The patch series is around for couple of weeks already and went through the review of Sean and Bart, with all their feedback being applied. Also Sagi and Co enhanced krping to fully cover (and test...) the proposed API and driver implementation @ git://bean

Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] Introduce Signature feature

2013-11-14 Thread Or Gerlitz
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Hefty, Sean wrote: >> To begin with T10 DIF **is** industry standard, which is to be used in >> production storage systems, the feature here is T10 DIF acceleration for >> upstream kernel storage drivers such as iSER/SRP/FCoE initiator/targets >> that use RDMA and

RE: [PATCH v3 00/10] Introduce Signature feature

2013-11-14 Thread Hefty, Sean
> To begin with T10 DIF **is** industry standard, which is to be used in > production storage systems, the feature here is T10 DIF acceleration for > upstream kernel storage drivers such as iSER/SRP/FCoE initiator/targets > that use RDMA and are included in commercial distributions which are > used

Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] Introduce Signature feature

2013-11-14 Thread Sagi Grimberg
On 11/14/2013 9:30 AM, Or Gerlitz wrote: On 14/11/2013 02:19, Hefty, Sean wrote: The patch series is around for couple of weeks already and went through the review of Sean and Bart, with all their feedback being applied. Also Sagi and Co enhanced krping to fully cover (and test...) the propose

Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] Introduce Signature feature

2013-11-13 Thread Or Gerlitz
On 14/11/2013 02:19, Hefty, Sean wrote: The patch series is around for couple of weeks already and went through the review of Sean and Bart, with all their feedback being applied. Also Sagi and Co enhanced krping to fully cover (and test...) the proposed API and driver implementation Somewhat

RE: [PATCH v3 00/10] Introduce Signature feature

2013-11-13 Thread Hefty, Sean
> The patch series is around for couple of weeks already and went > through the review of Sean and Bart, with all their feedback being > applied. Also Sagi and Co enhanced krping to fully cover (and test...) > the proposed API and driver implementation @ > git://beany.openfabrics.org/~sgrimberg/krp

Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] Introduce Signature feature

2013-11-07 Thread Or Gerlitz
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Sagi Grimberg wrote: > This patchset Introduces Verbs level support for signature handover > feature. Siganture is intended to implement end-to-end data integrity > on a transactional basis in a completely offloaded manner. Hi Roland, The patch series is around fo

[PATCH v3 00/10] Introduce Signature feature

2013-11-07 Thread Sagi Grimberg
This patchset Introduces Verbs level support for signature handover feature. Siganture is intended to implement end-to-end data integrity on a transactional basis in a completely offloaded manner. There are several end-to-end data integrity methods used today in various applications and/or upper l