Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] Introduce Signature feature

2014-03-09 Thread Sagi Grimberg
On 3/7/2014 9:43 PM, Roland Dreier wrote: So I went ahead and applied this for 3.15, Hey Roland, Thanks for taking the time to take a look and pick this up. although I suspect the verbs API is probably the wrong one. I will be more than happy to here your concerns, share our approach and

Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] Introduce Signature feature

2014-03-07 Thread Roland Dreier
So I went ahead and applied this for 3.15, although I suspect the verbs API is probably the wrong one. I understand that the mlx5 microarchitecture requires some of this signature binding stuff to go through a work queue, but conceptually I don't think the IB_WR_REG_SIG_MR work request makes

Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] Introduce Signature feature

2014-02-24 Thread Sagi Grimberg
On 2/24/2014 9:01 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: On Sun, 2014-02-23 at 14:19 +0200, Sagi Grimberg wrote: This patchset Introduces Verbs level support for signature handover feature. Siganture is intended to implement end-to-end data integrity on a transactional basis in a completely offloaded

[PATCH v5 00/10] Introduce Signature feature

2014-02-23 Thread Sagi Grimberg
This patchset Introduces Verbs level support for signature handover feature. Siganture is intended to implement end-to-end data integrity on a transactional basis in a completely offloaded manner. There are several end-to-end data integrity methods used today in various applications and/or upper

Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] Introduce Signature feature

2014-02-23 Thread Nicholas A. Bellinger
On Sun, 2014-02-23 at 14:19 +0200, Sagi Grimberg wrote: This patchset Introduces Verbs level support for signature handover feature. Siganture is intended to implement end-to-end data integrity on a transactional basis in a completely offloaded manner. There are several end-to-end data