Re: [PATCH v5 00/26] New fast registration API

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 4:16 PM, Doug Ledford wrote: > On 10/29/2015 01:42 AM, Or Gerlitz wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 4:34 AM, Doug Ledford wrote: >>> Yes, I've pulled this in for 4.4. Thanks! >> >> Doug, we want to run regression over the 4.4

Re: [PATCH v5 00/26] New fast registration API

hi On 11/1/2015 17:00, Or Gerlitz wrote: > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 4:16 PM, Doug Ledford wrote: >> On 10/29/2015 01:42 AM, Or Gerlitz wrote: >>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 4:34 AM, Doug Ledford wrote: Yes, I've pulled this in for 4.4. Thanks! >>>

Re: [PATCH v5 00/26] New fast registration API

Hi, On Sun, 1 Nov 2015 17:00:22 +0200 Or Gerlitz wrote: > > Stephen, is the framework for linux-next merge tests OK with this tag? > can you confirm that the > -next bits of the rdma tree are covered fine? linux-next fetches the "for-next" tag for that tree. -- Cheers,

Re: [PATCH v5 00/26] New fast registration API

On 10/29/2015 01:42 AM, Or Gerlitz wrote: > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 4:34 AM, Doug Ledford wrote: >> Yes, I've pulled this in for 4.4. Thanks! > > Doug, we want to run regression over the 4.4 bits, when do you expect > for them to show up @ your kernel.org tree? Sorry, when

Re: [PATCH v5 00/26] New fast registration API

On 10/29/2015 10:33 AM, Sagi Grimberg wrote: > > > On 29/10/2015 16:16, Doug Ledford wrote: >> On 10/29/2015 01:42 AM, Or Gerlitz wrote: >>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 4:34 AM, Doug Ledford >>> wrote: Yes, I've pulled this in for 4.4. Thanks! >>> >>> Doug, we want to run

Re: [PATCH v5 00/26] New fast registration API

On 10/29/2015 11:24 AM, Sagi Grimberg wrote: > >>> I can provide a patch for hfi, anything else needed? >> >> It breaks all of them in staging, not just hgi1. So, hfi1, amso1100, >> ipath, and ehca. > > hfi1: Does not support FRWR at all, there are just some copy-paste > sections that

Re: [PATCH v5 00/26] New fast registration API

I can provide a patch for hfi, anything else needed? It breaks all of them in staging, not just hgi1. So, hfi1, amso1100, ipath, and ehca. hfi1: Does not support FRWR at all, there are just some copy-paste sections that supposedly handle it - so I'll drop any sign of it from the code.

Re: [PATCH v5 00/26] New fast registration API

On 10/20/2015 07:33 AM, Sagi Grimberg wrote: > Doug, are you planning on taking this for 4.4? > > I think this set has converged towards inclusion. > > Reminder, this series goes on top of Christoph's > wr_cleanup patches and iser bounce buffering cleanup. Yes, I've pulled this in for 4.4.

Re: [PATCH v5 00/26] New fast registration API

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 4:34 AM, Doug Ledford wrote: > Yes, I've pulled this in for 4.4. Thanks! Doug, we want to run regression over the 4.4 bits, when do you expect for them to show up @ your kernel.org tree? some of them are there but @ least 3-4 series which you said

Re: [PATCH v5 00/26] New fast registration API

Doug, are you planning on taking this for 4.4? I think this set has converged towards inclusion. Reminder, this series goes on top of Christoph's wr_cleanup patches and iser bounce buffering cleanup. Sagi. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of

[PATCH v5 00/26] New fast registration API

Hi all, As discussed on the linux-rdma list, there is plenty of room for improvement in our memory registration APIs. We keep finding ULPs that are duplicating code, sometimes use wrong strategies and mis-use our current API. As a first step, this patch set replaces the fast registration API to